Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987605›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2018

The Feasibility of Breast-Conserving Surgery for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: An Initial Report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance) Trial.

Kari M Rosenkranz, Karla Ballman, Linda McCall, Charlotte Kubicky, Laurie Cuttino, Huong Le-Petross, Kelly K Hunt, Armando Giuliano, Kimberly J Van Zee, Bruce Haffty and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01556243 (Impact of Breast Conservation Surgery on Surgical Outcomes and Cosmesis in Patients With Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01556243 phase2completednot on this map

Impact of Breast Conservation Surgery on Surgical Outcomes and Cosmesis in Patients With Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancers (MIBC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan2012 to 2023Enrolled270ConditionsBreast CancerArmstherapeutic conventional surgery, whole breast irradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2023 Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients With Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Results From ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Breast cancer: an up-to-date review and future perspectives.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  17. Five decades of progress in surgical oncology: Breast.Journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Addressing the problem of overtreatment in breast cancer.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Kari M RosenkranzDartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. kari.m.rosenkranz@hitchcock.org.
Karla BallmanAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Linda McCallAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Charlotte KubickyOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Laurie CuttinoVirginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
Huong Le-PetrossThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly K HuntThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Armando GiulianoCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kimberly J Van ZeeMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Bruce HafftyRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Judy C BougheyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAlliance Data (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCornell University · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
NCI, National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) UG1 (funded extension)UG1CA232760 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Judy Caroline Boughey, Aaron Scott Mansfield · 2019 to 2026
$8.5M
Naional Cancer Institute, Naitonal Clinical Trials Network U10 Lead Academic SiteU10CA180790 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALBERTS, STEVEN R, BOUGHEY, JUDY CAROLINE · 2014 to 2018
$6.6M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP)U10CA180858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUNT, KELLY K, PINNIX, CHELSEA CAMILLE · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
Dartmouth Lead Participation in NCI National Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180854 · NCI · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI DRAGNEV, KONSTANTIN H. · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation U10CA180821Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation U10CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180790NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180854NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) has been a contraindication to breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We report the feasibility of BCT in MIBC from the ACOSOG Z11102 trial [Alliance], a single arm noninferiority trial of BCT for women with two or three sites of malignancy in the ipsilateral breast.

methodsWomen who enrolled preoperatively in ACOSOG Z11102 were evaluated for conversion to mastectomy and need for reoperation to obtain negative margins. Characteristics of women who successfully underwent BCT and those who converted to mastectomy were compared. Factors were examined for association with the need for margin reexcision.

resultsOf 198 patients enrolled preoperatively, 190 (96%) had 2 foci of disease. Median size of the largest tumor focus was 1.5 (range 0.1-7.0) cm; 49 patients (24.8%) had positive nodes. There were 14 women who underwent mastectomy due to positive margins, resulting in a conversion to mastectomy rate of 7.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9-10.6%). Of 184 patients who successfully completed BCT, 134 completed this in a single operation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis did not identify any factors significantly associated with conversion to mastectomy or need for margin reexcision.

conclusionsBreast conservation is feasible in MIBC with 67.6% of patients achieving a margin-negative excision in a single operation and 7.1% of patients requiring conversion to mastectomy due to positive margins. No characteristic was identified that significantly altered the risk of conversion to mastectomy or need for reexcision. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01556243.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBiopsyBreastBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29987605
PMCPMC6192830
OpenAlexW2849767835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.