ArticleJournal of neurovirology2018
Clearance of attenuated rabies virus from brain tissues is required for long-term protection against CNS challenge with a pathogenic variant.
Article in Journal of neurovirology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- mAb therapy controls CNS-resident lyssavirus infection via a CD4 T cell-dependent mechanism.EMBO molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Immunological impact of tetrahydrobiopterin on the central nervous system in a murine model of rabies virus infection.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2021Article
- Brain tissue-resident immune memory cells are required for long-term protection against CNS infection with rabies virus.Future virology · 2020Review
- Comparative models for human nasal infections and immunity.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rabies virus is a neurotropic lyssavirus which is 100% fatal in its pathogenic form when reaching unprotected CNS tissues. Death can be prevented by mechanisms delivering appropriate immune effectors across the blood-brain barrier which normally remains intact during pathogenic rabies virus infection. One therapeutic approach is to superinfect CNS tissues with attenuated rabies virus which induces blood-brain barrier permeability and immune cell entry. Current thinking is that peripheral rabies immunization is sufficient to protect against a challenge with pathogenic rabies virus. While this is undoubtedly the case if the virus is confined to the periphery, what happens if the virus reaches the CNS is less well-understood. In the current study, we find that peripheral immunization does not fully protect mice long-term against an intranasal challenge with pathogenic rabies virus. Protection is significantly better in mice that have cleared attenuated virus from the CNS and is associated with a more robust CNS recall response evidently due to the presence in CNS tissues of elevated numbers of lymphocytes phenotypically resembling long-term resident immune cells. Adoptive transfer of cells from rabies-immune mice fails to protect against CNS challenge with pathogenic rabies virus further supporting the concept that long-term resident immune cell populations must be established in brain tissues to protect against a subsequent CNS challenge with pathogenic rabies virus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.