Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987561›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Towards spill-free in-bag morcellation: a health failure mode and effects analysis.

Lukas van den Haak, Anne C van der Eijk, Evelien M Sandberg, Gerard Peter G M Frank, Karin Ansink, Rob C M Pelger, Cor D de Kroon, Frank Willem Jansen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas van den HaakDepartment of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anne C van der EijkCentral Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medica Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evelien M SandbergDepartment of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gerard Peter G M FrankDepartment of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karin AnsinkOperating Room Center, Leiden University Medica Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob C M PelgerDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cor D de KroonDepartment of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frank Willem JansenDepartment of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. f.w.jansen@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NLDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess potential risks of new surgical procedures and devices before their introduction into daily practice, a prospective risk inventory (PRI) is a required step. This study assesses the applicability of the Health Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) as part of a PRI of new technology in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

methodsA reference case was defined of a patient with presumed benign leiomyoma undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy including in-bag power morcellation; however, pathology defined a stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma. Using in-bag morcellation as a template, a HFMEA was performed. All steps of the in-bag morcellation technique were identified. Next, the possible hazards of these steps were explored and possible measures to control these hazards were discussed.

resultsFive main steps of the morcellation process were identified. For retrieval bags without openings to accommodate instruments inside the bag, 120 risks were identified. Of these risks, 67 should be eliminated. For containment bags with openings 131 risks were identified of which 68 should be eliminated. Of the 10 causes most at risk to cause spillage, two can be eliminated by using appropriate bag materials. Myomectomy appears to be more at risk for residual tissue spillage compared to total hysterectomy.

conclusionThe HFMEA has provided important new insights regarding potential weaknesses of the in-bag morcellation technique, particularly with respect to hazardous steps in the morcellation process as well as requirements that bags should meet. As such, this study has shown HFMEA to be a valuable method that identifies and quantifies potential hazards of new technology.

Indexed as

FemaleHealthcare Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisHumansHysterectomyLaparoscopyLeiomyosarcomaMorcellationProspective StudiesUterine MyomectomyUterine NeoplasmsHysterectomyLaparoscopyMorcellationMyomectomySarcoma

Identifiers

PMID29987561
PMCPMC6132883
OpenAlexW2837504978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.