Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987025›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Enhanced brain activity associated with memory access in highly superior autobiographical memory.

Valerio Santangelo, Clarissa Cavallina, Paola Colucci, Alessia Santori, Simone Macrì, James L McGaugh, Patrizia Campolongo

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Common and distinct correlates of construction and elaboration of episodic-autobiographical memory: An ALE meta-analysis.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The seven sins of memory: an update.Memory (Hove, England) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerio SantangeloDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences & Education, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy; valerio.santangelo@unipg.it james.mcgaugh@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9665-8701
Clarissa CavallinaDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences & Education, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.
Paola ColucciDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Alessia SantoriDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Simone MacrìCentre for Behavioural Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-4784
James L McGaughCenter for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3800; valerio.santangelo@unipg.it james.mcgaugh@uci.edu.
Patrizia CampolongoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain systems underlying human memory function have been classically investigated studying patients with selective memory impairments. The discovery of rare individuals who have highly superior autobiographical memory (HSAM) provides, instead, an opportunity to investigate the brain systems underlying enhanced memory. Here, we carried out an fMRI investigation of a group of subjects identified as having HSAM. During fMRI scanning, eight subjects with HSAM and 21 control subjects were asked to retrieve autobiographical memories (AMs) as well as non-AMs (e.g., examples of animals). Subjects were instructed to signal the "access" to an AM by a key press and to continue "reliving" it immediately after. Compared with controls, individuals with HSAM provided a richer AM recollection and were faster in accessing AMs. The access to AMs was associated with enhanced prefrontal/hippocampal functional connectivity. AM access also induced increased activity in the left temporoparietal junction and enhanced functional coupling with sensory cortices in subjects with HSAM compared with controls. In contrast, subjects with HSAM did not differ from controls in functional activity during the reliving phase. These findings, based on fMRI assessment, provide evidence of interaction of brain systems engaged in memory retrieval and suggest that enhanced activity of these systems is selectively involved in enabling more efficient access to past experiences in HSAM.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleMemoryfMRIfunctional connectivityhippocampuslong-term memoryprefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID29987025
PMCPMC6064994
OpenAlexW2858644727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.