Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987016›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Subsistence practices, past biodiversity, and anthropogenic impacts revealed by New Zealand-wide ancient DNA survey.

Frederik V Seersholm, Theresa L Cole, Alicia Grealy, Nicolas J Rawlence, Karen Greig, Michael Knapp, Michael Stat, Anders J Hansen, Luke J Easton, Lara Shepherd and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Documenting the short-tailed albatross (Ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Early tropical crop production in marginal subtropical and temperate Polynesia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Frederik V SeersholmTrace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia; frederikseersholm@gmail.com michael.bunce@curtin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-3247
Theresa L ColeLong-Term Ecology Laboratory, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, 7640 Canterbury, New Zealand.
Alicia GrealyTrace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
Nicolas J RawlenceOtago Palaeogenetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 9054 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Karen GreigDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Otago, 9016 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Michael KnappDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, 9016 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Michael StatDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Anders J HansenCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Luke J EastonOtago Palaeogenetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 9054 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lara ShepherdMuseum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, 6011 Wellington, New Zealand.
Alan J D TennysonMuseum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, 6011 Wellington, New Zealand.
R Paul ScofieldDepartment of Natural History, Canterbury Museum, 8013 Christchurch, New Zealand.
Richard WalterDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Otago, 9016 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Michael BunceTrace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia; frederikseersholm@gmail.com michael.bunce@curtin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New Zealand's geographic isolation, lack of native terrestrial mammals, and Gondwanan origins make it an ideal location to study evolutionary processes. However, since the archipelago was first settled by humans 750 y ago, its unique biodiversity has been under pressure, and today an estimated 49% of the terrestrial avifauna is extinct. Current efforts to conserve the remaining fauna rely on a better understanding of the composition of past ecosystems, as well as the causes and timing of past extinctions. The exact temporal and spatial dynamics of New Zealand's extinct fauna, however, can be difficult to interpret, as only a small proportion of animals are preserved as morphologically identifiable fossils. Here, we conduct a large-scale genetic survey of subfossil bone assemblages to elucidate the impact of humans on the environment in New Zealand. By genetically identifying more than 5,000 nondiagnostic bone fragments from archaeological and paleontological sites, we reconstruct a rich faunal record of 110 species of birds, fish, reptiles, amphibians, and marine mammals. We report evidence of five whale species rarely reported from New Zealand archaeological middens and characterize extinct lineages of leiopelmatid frog (

Indexed as

BiodiversityBone and BonesFossilsGene PoolAnimalsDNANew ZealandDNAancient DNAbulk bone metabarcodinghuman impactspaleoecologysubsistence practices

Identifiers

PMID29987016
PMCPMC6065006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.