Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987007›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Systems genetic analysis of inversion polymorphisms in the malaria mosquito

Changde Cheng, John C Tan, Matthew W Hahn, Nora J Besansky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolutionary adaptation under climate change:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolutionary adaptation under climate change:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Standing genetic variation and chromosome differences drove rapid ecotype formation in a major malaria mosquito.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Testing for fitness epistasis in a transplant experiment identifies a candidate adaptive locus inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Changde ChengEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.ORCID 0000-0002-2458-2522
John C TanEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.
Matthew W HahnDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.ORCID 0000-0002-5731-8808
Nora J BesanskyEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; nbesansk@nd.edu.

Funding

Empowering functional genomics of An. gambiae through inversion genotypingR01AI125360 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BESANSKY, NORA JESSIE · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
Functional Genomics of Inversion 2La in Anopheles gambiaeR01AI076584 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BESANSKY, NORA JESSIE · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076584NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inversion polymorphisms in the African malaria vector

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionQuantitative Trait, HeritableTranscriptomeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAnophelesChromosomes, InsectFemaleMaleAnopheles gambiaeariditychromosomal inversionclimate adaptationsystems genetics

Identifiers

PMID29987007
PMCPMC6064990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.