ArticleInfection and immunity2018
Article in Infection and immunity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Scalp Microbiome-Hair Axis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Translation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Microneedle array delivery ofiScience · 2024Article
- Harnessing Biomaterials to Study and Direct Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy.ACS applied bio materials · 2023Review
- Tuning innate immune function using microneedles containing multiple classes of toll-like receptor agonists.Nanoscale · 2023Article
- Optimisation of Design and Manufacturing Parameters of 3D Printed Solid Microneedles for Improved Strength, Sharpness, and Drug Delivery.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Progress in microneedle array patch (MAP) for vaccine delivery.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Microneedle arrays integrated with living organisms for smart biomedical applications.Theranostics · 2021Review
- Microneedle Coating Methods: A Review with a Perspective.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Infectious diseases propagated by arthropod vectors, such as tularemia, are commonly initiated via dermal infection of the skin. However, due to the technical difficulties in achieving accurate and reproducible dermal deposition, intradermal models are less commonly used. To overcome these limitations, we used microneedle arrays (MNAs), which are micron-scale polymeric structures, to temporarily disrupt the barrier function of the skin and deliver a bacterial inoculum directly to the dermis of an animal. MNAs increase reliability by eliminating leakage of the inoculum or blood from the injection site, thereby providing a biologically relevant model for arthropod-initiated disease. Here, we validate the use of MNAs as a means to induce intradermal infection using a murine model of tularemia initiated by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.