Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29986760›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Biological compatibility between two temperate lineages of brown dog ticks, Rhipicephalus sanguineus (sensu lato).

Filipe Dantas-Torres, Maria Stefania Latrofa, Rafael Antonio Nascimento Ramos, Riccardo Paolo Lia, Gioia Capelli, Antonio Parisi, Daniele Porretta, Sandra Urbanelli, Domenico Otranto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Investigation of the p28 Gene ofVeterinary medicine international · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic Variation inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Filipe Dantas-TorresDepartment of Immunology, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Recife, Pernambuco, 50670420, Brazil. filipe.dantas@cpqam.fiocruz.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1496-6274
Maria Stefania LatrofaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70010 Valenzano, Bari, Italy.
Rafael Antonio Nascimento RamosAcademic Unit of Garanhuns, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, 55292270, Brazil.
Riccardo Paolo LiaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70010 Valenzano, Bari, Italy.
Gioia CapelliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020, Legnaro, Italy.
Antonio ParisiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, Contrada S. Pietro Piturno, 70017 Putignano, Bari, Italy.
Daniele PorrettaDepartment of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Sandra UrbanelliDepartment of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70010 Valenzano, Bari, Italy. domenico.otranto@uniba.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (sensu stricto) is reputed to be the most widespread tick of domestic dogs worldwide and has also been implicated in the transmission of many pathogens to dogs and humans. For more than two centuries, Rh. sanguineus (s.s.) was regarded as a single taxon, even considering its poor original description and the inexistence of a type specimen. However, genetic and crossbreeding experiments have indicated the existence of at least two distinct taxa within this name: the so-called "temperate" and "tropical" lineages of Rh. sanguineus (sensu lato). Recent genetic studies have also demonstrated the existence of additional lineages of Rh. sanguineus (s.l.) in Europe and Asia. Herein, we assessed the biological compatibility between two lineages of Rh. sanguineus (s.l.) found in southern Europe, namely Rhipicephalus sp. I (from Italy) and Rhipicephalus sp. II (from Portugal).

methodsTicks morphologically identified as Rh. sanguineus (s.l.) were collected in southern Portugal and southern Italy. Tick colonies were established and crossbreeding experiments conducted. Morphological, biological and genetic analyses were conducted.

resultsCrossbreeding experiments confirmed that ticks from the two studied lineages were able to mate and generate fertile hybrids. Hybrid adult ticks always presented the same genotype of the mother, confirming maternal inheritance of mtDNA. However, larvae and nymphs originated from Rhipicephalus sp. I females presented mtDNA genotype of either Rhipicephalus sp. I or Rhipicephalus sp. II, suggesting the occurrence of paternal inheritance or mitochondrial heteroplasmy. While biologically compatible, these lineages are distinct genetically and phenotypically.

conclusionsThe temperate lineages of Rh. sanguineus (s.l.) studied herein are biologically compatible and genetic data obtained from both pure and hybrid lines indicate the occurrence of paternal inheritance or mitochondrial heteroplasmy. This study opens new research avenues and raises question regarding the usefulness of genetic data and crossbreeding experiments as criteria for the definition of cryptic species in ticks.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialDog DiseasesDogsEuropeFemaleHybridization, GeneticNymphPaternal InheritancePhenotypePhylogenyPortugalRhipicephalusRhipicephalus sanguineusSequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialBiologyCrossbreedingGeneticsMitochondrial heteroplasmyMorphologyPaternal inheritanceTicks

Identifiers

PMID29986760
PMCPMC6038233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.