Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29986743›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Morphological plasticity in Myxobolus Bütschli, 1882: a taxonomic dilemma case and renaming of a parasite species of the common carp.

Qingxiang Guo, Mingjun Huang, Yang Liu, Xiuping Zhang, Zemao Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Morphological and molecular characterisation ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Morphological and molecular characterisation of two closely related species:International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Somatic Dimorphism in Cercariae of a Bird Schistosome.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingxiang GuoDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine, College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Mingjun HuangDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine, College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine, College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Xiuping ZhangDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine, College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Zemao GuDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine, College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430070, People's Republic of China. guzemao@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-46Featuring Talents Cultivation Project 4611300108Nature Science Foundation of China 31572233the Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center 2016620000001046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyxozoans are a group of cnidarian parasites, the present taxonomy of which favors a more comprehensive characterization strategy combining spore morphology, biological traits (host/organ specificity, tissue tropism), and DNA data over the classical morphology-based taxonomy. However, a systematist might again run into a taxonomic dilemma if more than two of the following exceptional cases were encountered at the same time: extensive intraspecific polymorphism, interspecific morphological similarity, identical interspecific biological traits and blurred small-subunit (SSU) rDNA-based species boundaries. In the present study, spores of a species of Myxobolus Bütschli, 1882 with two morphotypes (wide type and narrow type) were collected from the gills of common carp Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus. Confusingly, the wide type was found to be identical to Myxobolus paratoyamai Kato, Kasai, Tomochi, Li & Sato, 2017 in spore morphology and SSU rDNA sequence, which confidently suggested their conspecificity; while the narrow type, was highly similar to Myxobolus toyamai Kudo, 1917 based on spore morphology and SSU rDNA sequence and thus could not be easily classified. This discordance between wide type and narrow type has caused a taxonomic dilemma. To address this problem, a hypothesis about the conspecificity of the narrow type and M. toyamai was addressed.

resultsIt was found that if the narrow type is conspecific with M. toyamai, it would be paradoxical for the SSU rDNA sequence of the narrow type to be more similar to M. paratoyamai (99.3%), Myxobolus acinosus Nie & Li, 1973 (98.6%) and Myxobolus longisporus Nie & Li, 1992 (98.7%) than to M. toyamai (97.6%). According to the results of the above what-if analysis, the narrow type and M. toyamai were considered to be different species. All in all, the present dual-morphotype species is estimated to be conspecific with M. paratoyamai Kato, Kasai, Tomochi, Li & Sato, 2017. Considering that this species name was preoccupied by Myxobolus paratoyamai Nie & Li, 1992, the replacement name Myxobolus pseudoacinosus nom. nov. is proposed.

conclusionsThis work addresses the taxonomic dilemma in polymorphic myxozoans and demonstrates that M. pseudoacinosus is a distinct species with two morphotypes. The present study may serve as a baseline for future studies that encounter similar classification complexities.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarpsDNA, RibosomalFish DiseasesGillsMyxobolusParasitic Diseases, AnimalPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSequence Analysis, DNASporesDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18SMorphotypeMyxobolus pseudoacinosusMyxozoanSSU rDNATaxonomic dilemmaTissue tropism

Identifiers

PMID29986743
PMCPMC6038286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.