Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29986722›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

"It's better to have three brains working instead of one": a qualitative study of building therapeutic alliance with family members of critically ill patients.

Csilla Kalocsai, Andre Amaral, Dominique Piquette, Grace Walter, Shelly P Dev, Paul Taylor, James Downar, Lesley Gotlib Conn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Critical care providers' support of families in bereavement: a mixed-methods study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Csilla KalocsaiTrauma, Emergency and Critical Care Research, Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. csilla.kalocsai@camh.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-2053
Andre AmaralTrauma, Emergency and Critical Care Research, Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Dominique PiquetteTrauma, Emergency and Critical Care Research, Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Grace WalterSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Shelly P DevInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paul TaylorSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
James DownarInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lesley Gotlib ConnTrauma, Emergency and Critical Care Research, Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies in the intensive care unit (ICU) suggest that better communication between families of critically ill patients and healthcare providers is needed; however, most randomized trials targeting interventions to improve communication have failed to achieve family-centered outcomes. We aim to offer a novel analysis of the complexities involved in building positive family-provider relationships in the ICU through the consideration of not only communication but other important aspects of family-provider interactions, including family integration, collaboration, and empowerment. Our goal is to explore family members' perspectives on the enablers and challenges to establishing therapeutic alliance with ICU physicians and nurses.

methodsWe used the concept of therapeutic alliance as an organizational and analytic tool to conduct an interview-based qualitative study in a 20-bed adult medical-surgical ICU in an academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Nineteen family members of critically ill patients who acted as substitute decision-makers and/or regularly interacted with ICU providers were interviewed. Participants were sampled purposefully to ensure maximum variation along predetermined criteria. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach to analysis was used.

resultsParticipating family members highlighted the complementary roles and practices of ICU nurses and physicians in building therapeutic alliance. They reported how both provider groups had profession specific and shared contributions to foster family communication, integration, and collaboration, while physicians played a key role in family empowerment. Families' lack of familiarity with ICU personnel and processes, physicians' sporadic availability and use of medical jargon during rounds, however, reinforced long established power differences between lay families and expert physicians and challenged family integration. Family members also identified informal interactions as missed opportunities for relationship-building with physicians. While informal interactions with nurses at the bedside facilitated therapeutic alliance, inconsistent and ad-hoc interactions related to routine decision-making hindered family empowerment.

conclusionsMultiple opportunities exist to improve family-provider relationships in the ICU. The four dimensions of therapeutic alliance prove analytically useful to highlight those aspects that work well and need improvement, such as in the areas of family integration and empowerment.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsTherapeutic AllianceAdultAgedCanadaCommunicationCritical IllnessDecision MakingFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPower, PsychologicalQualitative ResearchCollaborationCommunicationDecision-making, sharedFamilyIntensive care unitsQualitative researchTherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID29986722
PMCPMC6038351
OpenAlexW2830905608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.