ArticleBMC health services research2018
"It's better to have three brains working instead of one": a qualitative study of building therapeutic alliance with family members of critically ill patients.
Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family Engagement in the ICU: Not Just Information Sharing and Decision-Making.CHEST critical care · 2026Article
- Quality of communication in intensive care units: how families view interactions with doctors versus nurses.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Comfort as a need of the older adults in emergency departments: a scoping review.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Opportunities and threats to communication and relationships with patients and patients' loved ones along an intensive care unit journey: a qualitative journey mapping study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- "Get Well Enough to Make the Right Decision for Themselves"-Experiences and Perspectives of Clinicians Working with People with Serious Mental Illness and Their Substitute Decision Makers.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Families' opinions about their involvement in care during hospitalization: a mixed-methods study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Shared decision-making in the ICU from the perspective of physicians, nurses and patients: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Putting the Patient First: A Scoping Review of Patient Desires in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
- Article
- Resident competencies before and after short intensive care unit rotations: a multicentre pilot observational study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021Observational
- Critical care providers' support of families in bereavement: a mixed-methods study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2020Article
- Willingness to pay for family education and counselling services provided by critical care advanced practice nurses.International journal of nursing practice · 2019Article
- Periprocedural Antithrombotic Management from a Patient Perspective: A Qualitative Analysis.The American journal of medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies in the intensive care unit (ICU) suggest that better communication between families of critically ill patients and healthcare providers is needed; however, most randomized trials targeting interventions to improve communication have failed to achieve family-centered outcomes. We aim to offer a novel analysis of the complexities involved in building positive family-provider relationships in the ICU through the consideration of not only communication but other important aspects of family-provider interactions, including family integration, collaboration, and empowerment. Our goal is to explore family members' perspectives on the enablers and challenges to establishing therapeutic alliance with ICU physicians and nurses.
methodsWe used the concept of therapeutic alliance as an organizational and analytic tool to conduct an interview-based qualitative study in a 20-bed adult medical-surgical ICU in an academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Nineteen family members of critically ill patients who acted as substitute decision-makers and/or regularly interacted with ICU providers were interviewed. Participants were sampled purposefully to ensure maximum variation along predetermined criteria. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach to analysis was used.
resultsParticipating family members highlighted the complementary roles and practices of ICU nurses and physicians in building therapeutic alliance. They reported how both provider groups had profession specific and shared contributions to foster family communication, integration, and collaboration, while physicians played a key role in family empowerment. Families' lack of familiarity with ICU personnel and processes, physicians' sporadic availability and use of medical jargon during rounds, however, reinforced long established power differences between lay families and expert physicians and challenged family integration. Family members also identified informal interactions as missed opportunities for relationship-building with physicians. While informal interactions with nurses at the bedside facilitated therapeutic alliance, inconsistent and ad-hoc interactions related to routine decision-making hindered family empowerment.
conclusionsMultiple opportunities exist to improve family-provider relationships in the ICU. The four dimensions of therapeutic alliance prove analytically useful to highlight those aspects that work well and need improvement, such as in the areas of family integration and empowerment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.