ArticleGenes2018
Gene Regulatory Networks Reconstruction Using the Flooding-Pruning Hill-Climbing Algorithm.
Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reverse engineering gene regulatory network based on complex-valued ordinary differential equation model.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The explosion of genomic data provides new opportunities to improve the task of gene regulatory network reconstruction. Because of its inherent probability character, the Bayesian network is one of the most promising methods. However, excessive computation time and the requirements of a large number of biological samples reduce its effectiveness and application to gene regulatory network reconstruction. In this paper, Flooding-Pruning Hill-Climbing algorithm (FPHC) is proposed as a novel hybrid method based on Bayesian networks for gene regulatory networks reconstruction. On the basis of our previous work, we propose the concept of DPI Level based on data processing inequality (DPI) to better identify neighbors of each gene on the lack of enough biological samples. Then, we use the search-and-score approach to learn the final network structure in the restricted search space. We first analyze and validate the effectiveness of FPHC in theory. Then, extensive comparison experiments are carried out on known Bayesian networks and biological networks from the DREAM (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods) challenge. The results show that the FPHC algorithm, under recommended parameters, outperforms, on average, the original hill climbing and Max-Min Hill-Climbing (MMHC) methods with respect to the network structure and running time. In addition, our results show that FPHC is more suitable for gene regulatory network reconstruction with limited data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.