Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29986467›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

An Insight into the Difficulties in the Discovery of Specific Biomarkers of Limbal Stem Cells.

Zhi Hou Guo, Wei Zhang, Yang Yan Sheng Jia, Qing Xiu Liu, Zhao Fa Li, Jun Sheng Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomedical Application of MSCs in Corneal Regeneration and Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. PAX6-WNK2 Axis Governs Corneal Epithelial Homeostasis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Process development and safety evaluation of ABCB5Stem cell research & therapy · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhi Hou GuoSchool of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China. 1601116005@hqu.edu.cn.
Wei ZhangSchool of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China. weizhang1992@hqu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-7934
Yang Yan Sheng JiaSchool of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China. 1234111009@hqu.edu.cn.
Qing Xiu LiuSchool of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China. 17011071006@hqu.edu.cn.
Zhao Fa LiSchool of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China. lizhaofa@hqu.edu.cn.
Jun Sheng LinSchool of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China. junshenglin@hqu.edu.cn.
Huaqiao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keeping the integrity and transparency of the cornea is the most important issue to ensure normal vision. There are more than 10 million patients going blind due to the cornea diseases worldwide. One of the effective ways to cure corneal diseases is corneal transplantation. Currently, donations are the main source of corneas for transplantation, but immune rejection and a shortage of donor corneas are still serious problems. Graft rejection could cause transplanted cornea opacity to fail. Therefore, bioengineer-based corneas become a new source for corneal transplantation. Limbal stem cells (LSCs) are located at the basal layer in the epithelial palisades of Vogt, which serve a homeostatic function for the cornea epithelium and repair the damaged cornea. LSC-based transplantation is one of the hot topics currently. Clinical data showed that the ratio of LSCs to total candidate cells for a transplantation has a significant impact on the effectiveness of the transplantation. It indicates that it is very important to accurately identify the LSCs. To date, several putative biomarkers of LSCs have been widely reported, whereas their specificity is controversial. As reported, the identification of LSCs is based on the characteristics of stem cells, such as a nuclear-to-cytoplasm ratio (N/C) ≥ 0.7, label-retaining, and side population (SP) phenotype. Here, we review recently published data to provide an insight into the circumstances in the study of LSC biomarkers. The particularities of limbus anatomy and histochemistry, the limits of the current technology level for LSC isolation, the heterogeneity of LSCs and the influence of enzyme digestion are discussed. Practical approaches are proposed in order to overcome the difficulties in basic and applied research for LSC-specific biomarkers.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationCorneal TransplantationAnimalsBiomarkersCorneal DiseasesEpithelium, CornealHumansLimbus CorneaeMiceModels, AnimalRegenerationStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationBiomarkersheterogeneitylimbal stem cell (LSC)LSC biomarkerLSC niche

Identifiers

PMID29986467
PMCPMC6073450
OpenAlexW2838747349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.