Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29986164›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2018

How Movement Modulates Hearing.

David M Schneider, Richard Mooney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neural Evidence for Action-Related Somatosensory Predictions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Vocal Error Monitoring in the Primate Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Timing of Speech in Brain and Glottis and the Feedback Delay Problem in Motor Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Learning within a sensory-motor circuit links action to expected outcome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M SchneiderDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; email: mooney@neuro.duke.edu.
Richard MooneyDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; email: mooney@neuro.duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Mechanisms for internally and externally guided sensorimotor learningR01NS099288 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
Motor Modulation of Auditory ProcessingR01DC013826 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2015 to 2025
$3.8M
Auditory cortical processing of self-generated soundsR01DC018802 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI David Michael Schneider · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013826NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018802NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing is often viewed as a passive process: Sound enters the ear, triggers a cascade of activity through the auditory system, and culminates in an auditory percept. In contrast to a passive process, motor-related signals strongly modulate the auditory system from the eardrum to the cortex. The motor modulation of auditory activity is most well documented during speech and other vocalizations but also can be detected during a wide variety of other sound-generating behaviors. An influential idea is that these motor-related signals suppress neural responses to predictable movement-generated sounds, thereby enhancing sensitivity to environmental sounds during movement while helping to detect errors in learned acoustic behaviors, including speech and musicianship. Findings in humans, monkeys, songbirds, and mice provide new insights into the circuits that convey motor-related signals to the auditory system, while lending support to the idea that these signals function predictively to facilitate hearing and vocal learning.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysHearingHumansMovementVocalization, Animalcancellationcorollary dischargeforward modelshearingpredictionreafferencevocal learning

Identifiers

PMID29986164
PMCPMC6201761
OpenAlexW2880814084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.