Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29985943›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Development of a scoring method to visually score cortical interruptions on high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls.

Andrea Scharmga, Michiel Peters, Joop P van den Bergh, Piet Geusens, Daan Loeffen, Bert van Rietbergen, Thea Schoonbrood, Debby Vosse, René Weijers, Astrid van Tubergen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of bone structure and microstructure in the metacarpal heads between patients with psoriatic arthritis and healthy controls: an HR-pQCT study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Andrea ScharmgaDepartment of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-8827
Michiel PetersDepartment of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joop P van den BerghDepartment of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Piet GeusensDepartment of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daan LoeffenDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bert van RietbergenDepartment of Medical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Thea SchoonbroodDepartment of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Debby VosseDepartment of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
René WeijersDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Astrid van TubergenDepartment of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a scoring method to visually score cortical interruptions in finger joints on High-Resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT), determine its intra- and inter-reader reliability and test its feasibility.

methodsThe scoring method was developed by integrating results from in-depth discussions with experts, consensus meetings, multiple reading experiments and the literature. Cortical interruptions were scored by two independent readers in an imaging dataset with finger joints from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and healthy controls and assessed for adjacent trabecular distortion. Reliability for the total number of cortical interruptions per joint and per quadrant was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Feasibility was tested by recording the time to analyze one joint.

resultsIn 98 joints we identified 252 cortical interruptions, 17% had trabecular distortion. Mean diameter of the interruptions was significantly larger in patients with RA compared with healthy controls (0.88 vs 0.47 mm, p = 0.03). Intra-reader reliability was ICC 0.88 (95% CI 0.83;0.92) per joint and ICC 0.69 (95% CI 0.65;0.73) per quadrant. Inter-reader reliability was ICC 0.48 (95% CI 0.20;0.67) per joint and ICC 0.56 (95% CI 0.49;0.62) per quadrant. The time to score one joint was mean 9.2 (SD 4.9) min.

conclusionsThis scoring method allows detection of small cortical interruptions on HR-pQCT imaging of finger joints, which is promising for use in clinical studies.

Indexed as

AdultArthritis, RheumatoidCortical BoneFemaleFinger JointHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29985943
PMCPMC6037386
OpenAlexW2836826730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.