Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29985934›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Care workers, the unacknowledged persons in person-centred care: A secondary qualitative analysis of UK care home staff interviews.

Adam Kadri, Penny Rapaport, Gill Livingston, Claudia Cooper, Sarah Robertson, Paul Higgs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of identity in the experiences of dementia care workers from a minority ethnic background during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam KadriUCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Penny RapaportUCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gill LivingstonUCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6741-5516
Claudia CooperUCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah RobertsonUCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul HiggsUCL Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0077-0710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personhood discourses in dementia care have gained prominence and current care home standards mandate that care should be "person-centred". However, it is unclear how the personhood of staff is construed within the care relationship. This paper aims to explore how the personhood of paid carers of people with dementia can be understood by focussing on the views and experiences of care home staff. We undertook a secondary qualitative analysis of interviews with 25 paid care staff in England, conducted as part of the MARQUE (Managing Agitation and Raising QUality of lifE) study. The authors inductively developed themes around the topic of personhood for staff, contrasting management and care staff perspectives. We found that many care staff are not identified as persons in their own right by their employing institutions, and that there is a general lack of acknowledgment of the moral work of caring that occurs within formal care work. This oversight can reduce the complex relationships of care work to a series of care tasks, challenges care workers' self-worth and self-efficacy, and impede their efforts to deliver person-centred care. We conclude that care staff status as persons in their own right should be explicitly considered in quality standards and supported by employers' policies and practices, not simply for their role in preserving the personhood of people with dementia but for their own sense of valued personhood. Enhancing staff personhood may also result in improved care.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesPatient-Centered CareDementiaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleQuality of LifeRespectUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29985934
PMCPMC6037344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.