Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29985785›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2018

Evaluating the use of a field-based silica monitoring approach with dust from copper mines.

Emanuele Cauda, Lauren Chubb, Rustin Reed, Robert Stepp

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of Cancer Rate in Mine Workers Exposed to Crystalline Silica.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel sampling cassette for field-based analysis of respirable crystalline silica.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2021
    Article
  5. Recent Advances in Occupational Exposure Assessment of Aerosols.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emanuele Caudaa Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, Dust Control, Ventilation and Toxic Substances Branch , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania.
Lauren Chubba Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, Dust Control, Ventilation and Toxic Substances Branch , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania.
Rustin Reedb Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University , Prescot , Arizona.
Robert Steppc Freeport-McMoRan Inc. , Phoenix , Arizona.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring worker exposure to respirable crystalline silica in dusty environments is an important part of a proactive health and safety program. This is the case for surface copper mines in Arizona and New Mexico. The spatial and temporal variability of respirable dust and crystalline silica concentrations in those mines, coupled with the time lapse in obtaining crystalline silica analysis results from accredited laboratories, present a challenge for an effective exposure monitoring approach and the resulting intervention strategies. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is developing a novel approach to be used at a mine site for the quantification of crystalline silica in respirable dust samples collected with traditional sampling techniques. The non-destructive analysis is carried out using a portable Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) unit. In this study, respirable dust samples were collected over two visits to each of five copper mines, for a total of 10 datasets. The silica in each respirable dust sample was estimated by analyzing the sample with the portable FTIR unit. The quality of the estimation was assessed using the results of the NIOSH 7500 method on the same samples. The confounding effect of other minerals present in the respirable dust in the mines was also assessed, and two quantification approaches were investigated to address it: a sector-specific and a mine-specific approach. The results showed that the sector-specific approach is not effective due to the high variability of relative composition of the minerals among mines. For this approach the combined average relative difference was -13% (-17.6%, -8.9% CI). When using the mine-specific quantification approach, the average relative difference was as low as 2.8% (-3.7%, 9.3% CI); however, this approach was still affected by the variable relative composition of the minerals in the dust in each mine. The use of a multivariate approach on the analysis of each sample was proposed as the next step to achieve consistent low relative differences. This study demonstrates the potential of using a portable FTIR for estimation of crystalline silica in respirable dust samples for in-field exposure monitoring.

Indexed as

MiningAir Pollutants, OccupationalArizonaCopperDustEnvironmental MonitoringMineralsNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.New MexicoSilicon DioxideSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredUnited StatesAir Pollutants, OccupationalCopperDustMineralsSilicon DioxideDoF-FTIRfield-based monitoringminingrespirable crystalline silica

Identifiers

PMID29985785
PMCPMC6319252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.