Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29985476›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Visual discrimination of polymorphic nestlings in a cuckoo-host system.

Alfredo Attisano, Nozomu J Sato, Keita D Tanaka, Yuji Okahisa, Ralph Kuehn, Roman Gula, Keisuke Ueda, Jörn Theuerkauf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Higher-level pattern features provide additional information to birds when recognizing and rejecting parasitic eggs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alfredo AttisanoMuseum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-697, Warsaw, Poland. attisano@miiz.waw.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-6675-4900
Nozomu J SatoJapan Bird Research Association, 1-29-9, Sumiyoshi-cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-0034, Japan.
Keita D TanakaDepartment of Psychology, Keio University, Room 111, East Annex, 2-15-45, Mita, Minato, Tokyo, 108-0073, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9749-5094
Yuji OkahisaDepartment of Life Sciences, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo, 171-8501, Japan.
Ralph KuehnUnit of Molecular Zoology, Chair of Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Roman GulaMuseum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-697, Warsaw, Poland.
Keisuke UedaDepartment of Life Sciences, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo, 171-8501, Japan.
Jörn TheuerkaufMuseum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-697, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7273-3073

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 23255004Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 24-4578Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 24770028Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) 2012/05/E/NZ8/02694Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) 2016/23/B/NZ8/03082Rikkyo University SFR 11-54
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mimicry by avian brood parasites favours uniformity over variation within a breeding attempt as host defence against parasitism. In a cuckoo-host system from New Caledonia, the arms race resulted in both host (Gerygone flavolateralis) and parasite (Chalcites lucidus) having nestlings of two discrete skin colour phenotypes, bright and dark. In our study sites, host nestlings occurred in monomorphic and polymorphic broods, whereas cuckoo nestlings only occurred in the bright morph. Irrespective of their brood colour, host parents recognised and ejected parasite nestlings but never ejected their own. We investigated whether host parents visually recognised their own nestlings by using colour, luminance and pattern of multiple body regions. We found that the parasite mimicked multiple visual features of both host morphs and that the visual difference between host morphs was larger than the difference between the parasite and the mimicked host morph. Visual discrimination alone may result in higher chances of recognition errors in polymorphic than in monomorphic host broods. Host parents may rely on additional sensorial cues, not only visual, to assess nestling identity. Nestling polymorphism may be a trace of evolutionary past and may only have a marginal role in true-recognition of nestlings in the arms race in New Caledonia.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsNesting BehaviorNew CaledoniaPasseriformesPhenotypePredatory BehaviorSkin PigmentationSpecies SpecificityVideo RecordingVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID29985476
PMCPMC6037703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.