ArticleScientific reports2018
Detecting intermittent switching leadership in coupled dynamical systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying spike train synchrony and directionality: Measures and Applications.Biological cybernetics · 2026Review
- Behavior and biomechanics: flapping frequency during tandem and solo flights of cliff swallows.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Modes of information flow in collective cohesion.Science advances · 2022Article
- An all-leader agent-based model for turning and flocking birds.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leader-follower relationships are commonly hypothesized as a fundamental mechanism underlying collective behaviour in many biological and physical systems. Understanding the emergence of such behaviour is relevant in science and engineering to control the dynamics of complex systems toward a desired state. In prior works, due in part to the limitations of existing methods for dissecting intermittent causal relationships, leadership is assumed to be consistent in time and space. This assumption has been contradicted by recent progress in the study of animal behaviour. In this work, we leverage information theory and time series analysis to propose a novel and simple method for dissecting changes in causal influence. Our approach computes the cumulative influence function of a given individual on the rest of the group in consecutive time intervals and identify change in the monotonicity of the function as a change in its leadership status. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to dissect potential changes in leadership on self-propelled particles where the emergence of leader-follower relationship can be controlled and on tandem flights of birds recorded in their natural environment. Our method is expected to provide a novel methodological tool to further our understanding of collective behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.