Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29985399›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

N-mixture models reliably estimate the abundance of small vertebrates.

Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Benedetta Barzaghi, Andrea Melotto, Martina Muraro, Enrico Lunghi, Claudia Canedoli, Elia Lo Parrino, Veronica Nanni, Iolanda Silva-Rocha, Arianna Urso and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Es Colomer, a Unique Population of the Lilford's Wall Lizard,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Long-Term Seed Dispersal within an Asymmetric Lizard-Plant Interaction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Monitoring of the Endangered Cave SalamanderAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Gharial (Ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PeerJ · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Gentile Francesco FicetolaDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy. francesco.ficetola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-5155
Benedetta BarzaghiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Andrea MelottoDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Martina MuraroDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Enrico LunghiUniversität Trier Fachbereich VI Raum-und Umweltwissenschaften Biogeographie, Universitätsring 15, 54286, Trier, Germany.
Claudia CanedoliDISAT, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca. Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Elia Lo ParrinoDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Veronica NanniDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Science (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
Iolanda Silva-RochaCIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Campus de Vairão. 4485-661, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal.
Arianna UrsoDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Miguel Angel CarreteroCIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Campus de Vairão. 4485-661, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal.
Daniele SalviCIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Campus de Vairão. 4485-661, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-2690
Stefano ScaliMuseo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, I-20121, Milano, Italy.
Giorgio ScarìDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Roberta PennatiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Franco AndreoneMuseo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Via G. Giolitti, 36, I-10123, Torino, Italy.
Raoul ManentiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversidade do Porto · PTCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMuseo Egizio · ITOspedale di Prato Santo Stefano · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 772284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate measures of species abundance are essential to identify conservation strategies. N-mixture models are increasingly used to estimate abundance on the basis of species counts. In this study we tested whether abundance estimates obtained using N-mixture models provide consistent results with more traditional approaches requiring capture (capture-mark recapture and removal sampling). We focused on endemic, threatened species of amphibians and reptiles in Italy, for which accurate abundance data are needed for conservation assessments: the Lanza's Alpine salamander Salamandra lanzai, the Ambrosi's cave salamander Hydromantes ambrosii and the Aeolian wall lizard Podarcis raffonei. In visual counts, detection probability was variable among species, ranging between 0.14 (Alpine salamanders) and 0.60 (cave salamanders). For all the species, abundance estimates obtained using N-mixture models showed limited differences with the ones obtained through capture-mark-recapture or removal sampling. The match was particularly accurate for cave salamanders in sites with limited abundance and for lizards, nevertheless non-incorporating heterogeneity of detection probability increased bias. N-mixture models provide reliable abundance estimates that are comparable with the ones of more traditional approaches, and offer additional advantages such as a smaller sampling effort and no need of manipulating individuals, which in turn reduces the risk of harming animals and spreading diseases.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnimalsCaudataFemaleLizardsMalePopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID29985399
PMCPMC6037707
OpenAlexW2810157101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.