Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29985387›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The impact of stimulus size and orientation on individual face coding in monkey face-selective cortex.

Jessica Taubert, Goedele Van Belle, Rufin Vogels, Bruno Rossion

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Encoding of 3D physical dimensions by face-selective cortical neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Face pareidolia in male schizophrenia.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What does a "face cell" want?'Progress in neurobiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Parallel Processing of Facial Expression and Head Orientation in the Macaque Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica TaubertPsychological Sciences Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium. jesstaubert@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-8068
Goedele Van BellePsychological Sciences Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.
Rufin VogelsLaboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Bruno RossionPsychological Sciences Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKU Leuven · BEUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face-selective neurons in the monkey temporal cortex discharge at different rates in response to pictures of different individual faces. Here we tested whether this pattern of response across single neurons in the face-selective area ML (located in the middle Superior Temporal Sulcus) tolerates two affine transformations; picture-plane inversion, known to decrease the average response of face-selective neurons and the other, stimulus size. We recorded the response of 57 ML neurons in two awake and fixating monkeys. Face stimuli were presented at two sizes (10 and 5 degrees of visual angle) and two orientations (upright and inverted). Different faces elicited distinct patterns of activity across ML neurons that were reliable (i.e., predictable with a classifier) within a specific size and orientation condition. Despite observing a reduction in the average response magnitude of face-selective neurons to inverted faces, compared to upright faces, classifier performance was above chance for both upright and inverted faces. While decoding was largely preserved across changes in stimulus size, a classifier trained with one orientation condition and tested on the other did not lead to performance above chance level. We conclude that different individual faces can be decoded from patterns of responses in the monkey area ML regardless of orientation or size, but with qualitatively different patterns of responses for upright and inverted faces.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingFaceMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronsOrientation, SpatialPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationTemporal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID29985387
PMCPMC6037706
OpenAlexW2952366822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.