Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29985068›Full record

ArticleJournal of food protection2018

Interlaboratory Evaluation of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Escherichia coli Identification Microarray for Profiling Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli.

Isha R Patel, Jayanthi Gangiredla, David W Lacher, Mark K Mammel, Lori Bagi, Gian Marco Baranzoni, Pina M Fratamico, Elizabeth L Roberts, Chitrita DebROY, Rebecca L Lindsey and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food protection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Isha R Patel1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Molecular Biology, 8301 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, Maryland 20708, USA.
Jayanthi Gangiredla1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Molecular Biology, 8301 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, Maryland 20708, USA.
David W Lacher1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Molecular Biology, 8301 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, Maryland 20708, USA.
Mark K Mammel1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Molecular Biology, 8301 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, Maryland 20708, USA.
Lori Bagi2 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA.
Gian Marco Baranzoni2 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA.
Pina M Fratamico2 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA.
Elizabeth L Roberts3 Escherichia coli Reference Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Chitrita DebROY3 Escherichia coli Reference Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Rebecca L Lindsey4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
Devon V Stoneburg4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
Haley Martin4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
Peyton Smith4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
Nancy A Strockbine4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
Christopher A Elkins4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
Flemming Scheutz5 WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Escherichia and Klebsiella, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark; and.
Peter C H Feng6 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Microbiology, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Escherichia coli Identification (FDA-ECID) microarray provides rapid molecular characterization of E. coli. The effectiveness of the FDA-ECID for characterizing Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) was evaluated by three federal laboratories and one reference laboratory with a panel of 54 reference E. coli strains from the External Quality Assurance program. Strains were tested by FDA-ECID for molecular serotyping (O and H antigens), Shiga toxin subtyping, and the presence of the ehxA and eae genes for enterohemolysin and intimin, respectively. The FDA-ECID O typing was 96% reproducible among the four laboratories and 94% accurate compared with the reference External Quality Assurance data. Discrepancies were due to the absence of O41 target loci on the array and to two pairs of O types with identical target sequences. H typing was 96% reproducible and 100% accurate, with discrepancies due to two strains from one laboratory that were identified as mixed by FDA-ECID. Shiga toxin (Stx) type 1 subtyping was 100% reproducible and accurate, and Stx2 subtyping was 100% reproducible but only 64% accurate. FDA-ECID identified most Stx2 subtypes but had difficulty distinguishing among stx

Indexed as

Escherichia coli ProteinsFood MicrobiologyShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliHumansSerotypingShiga ToxinShiga Toxin 1United StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationVirulenceEscherichia coli ProteinsShiga ToxinShiga Toxin 1CharacterizationMicroarrayShiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID29985068
PMCPMC6193752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.