Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29984906›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Breast screening participation and retention among immigrants and nonimmigrants in British Columbia: A population-based study.

Ryan R Woods, Kimberlyn M McGrail, Erich V Kliewer, Arminee Kazanjian, Colin Mar, Lisa Kan, Janette Sam, John J Spinelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan R WoodsSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9520-2128
Kimberlyn M McGrailSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Erich V KliewerPopulation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arminee KazanjianSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Colin MarPopulation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lisa KanPopulation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Janette SamPopulation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John J SpinelliSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
BC Cancer Agency · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAManitoba Health · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer screening programs operate across Canada providing mammography to women in target age groups with the goal of reducing breast cancer mortality through early detection of tumors. Disparities in breast screening participation among socio-demographic groups, including immigrants, have been reported in Canada. Our objectives were to: (1) assess breast screening participation and retention among immigrant and nonimmigrant women in British Columbia (BC), Canada; and (2) to characterize factors associated with screening among screening-age recent immigrant women in BC. We examined 2 population-based cohorts of women eligible for breast screening participation (537 783 women) and retention (281 052 women) using linked health and immigration data. Breast screening rates were presented according to socio-demographic and health-related variables stratified by birth country. Factors associated with screening among recent immigrant women were explored using Poisson regression. We observed marked variation in screening participation across birth country cohorts. Eastern European/Central Asian women showed low participation (37.9%) with rates from individual countries ranging from 35.0% to 49.0%. Participation rates for immigrant women from the most common birth countries, such as China/Macau/Hong Kong/Taiwan (45.7%), India (44.5%), the Philippines (45.9%), and South Korea (39.0%), were lower than the nonimmigrant rates (51.2%). Retention rates showed less variation by birth country; however, some disparities between immigrant and nonimmigrant groups persisted. Associations between screening indicators and study factors varied considerably across immigrant groups. Primary care physician visits were consistently positively associated with screening participation; this variable was also the only predictor associated with screening within each of the groups of recent immigrants. Our study provides unique data on both screening participation and retention among Canadian immigrant women compiled by individual country of birth. Our results are further demonstration that screening disparities exist among immigrant populations as well as in comparison with nonimmigrant women.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsAgedBreast NeoplasmsBritish ColumbiaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPopulation Surveillancebreast cancercancer screeningequityimmigrantsmammographyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID29984906
PMCPMC6089191
OpenAlexW2836740731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.