Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29984373›Full record

SynthesisJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2018

Short-Term Memory, Inhibition, and Attention in Developmental Stuttering: A Meta-Analysis.

Levi C Ofoe, Julie D Anderson, Katerina Ntourou

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Meta-Analytical Review of Executive Function Skills in Adults Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Attention Bias in School-Age Children Who Stutter: Evidence From a Dot-Probe Task.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  4. The Significance of a Higher Prevalence of ADHD and ADHD Symptoms in Children Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiple-Community-Based Epidemiological Study of Stuttering among 3-Year-Old Children in Japan.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Verbal Response Inhibition in Adults Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Cognitive Flexibility for Semantic and Perceptual Information in Developmental Stuttering.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Levi C OfoeDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Julie D AndersonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Katerina NtourouDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington.

Funding

Cognitive-Linguistic Processes in Developmental StutteringR01DC012517 · NIDCD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, JULIE D · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents a meta-analytic review of differences in verbal short-term memory, inhibition, and attention between children who stutter (CWS) and children who do not stutter (CWNS). Method: Electronic databases and reference sections of articles were searched for candidate studies that examined verbal short-term memory, inhibition, and attention using behavioral and/or parent report measures. Twenty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria, which included, among other things, children between the ages of 3 and 18 years and the availability of quantitative data for effect size calculations. Data were extracted, coded, and analyzed, with the magnitude of the difference between the 2 groups of children being estimated using Hedge's g (Hedges & Olkin, 1985). Results: Based on the random-effects model (Hunter & Schmidt, 2004), findings revealed that CWS scored lower than CWNS on measures of nonword repetition (Hedges' g = -0.62), particularly at lengths of 2 and 3 syllables (Hedges' g = -0.62 and - 0.50, respectively), and forward span (Hedges' g = -0.40). Analyses further revealed that the parents of CWS rated their children as having weaker inhibition (Hedges' g = -0.44) and attentional focus/persistence (Hedges' g = -0.36) skills than the parents of CWNS, but there were no significant differences between CWS and CWNS in behavioral measures of inhibition and attention. Conclusion: The present findings were taken to suggest that cognitive processes are important variables associated with developmental stuttering.

Indexed as

AttentionInhibition, PsychologicalMemory, Short-TermAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleStuttering

Identifiers

PMID29984373
PMCPMC6195058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.