Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29984255›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use among HIV-Infected Women of Reproductive Age Attending Infectious Disease Clinic at Gulu Regional Referral Hospital, Northern Uganda.

Felix Bongomin, Mercy Chelangat, Anthony Eriatu, Bruno Chan Onen, Priscilla Cheputyo, Stephen A Godmercy, Eddymond Ekuk, Francis Idony, James Henry Obol

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix BongominDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-4515-8517
Mercy ChelangatDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Anthony EriatuDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Bruno Chan OnenDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Priscilla CheputyoDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Stephen A GodmercyDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Eddymond EkukDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Francis IdonyDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
James Henry ObolDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gulu University, P. O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-7789-3888
Gulu University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReproductive planning by HIV-infected women is essential, as it helps to prevent transmission of HIV to their unborn babies. Integrating contraceptive services to routine HIV care significantly increases the use of modern contraceptive methods, thus reducing vertical transmission of HIV.

objectivesTo determine the prevalence and factors associated with contraceptive use among HIV-infected women attending Infectious Disease Clinic (IDC) at Gulu Regional Referral Hospital (GRRH) in Northern Uganda. METHODOLOGY: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was performed. We used simple random sampling to recruit HIV-infected women receiving routine care from IDC, GRRH, into our study. Sample size was estimated using modified Kish-Leslie formula and semistructured questionnaire was used for data collection. Data was entered into EpiData version 3.1 and analysed using Stata v11.0. We used logistic regression model to assess the associations and any factor with p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe prevalence of contraceptive use was found to be 36% (95% CI 31 - 40%). Factors which promoted contraceptive use were as follows: being married (aOR=2.68, 95% CI 1.54-4.65, p<0.001) and monthly income of $35 -250 (aOR= 2.38, 95% CI: 1.39- 4.09, p=0.002). Factors that hindered contraceptive use were having no child (nulliparity) (aOR= 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.49; p=0.002) and age range of 31-49 years (aOR= 0.53; 95% CI: 0.33 - 0.84; p=0.007).

conclusionIn this study, just over a third of sexually active HIV-infected women reported use of modern contraceptives. This is a low level of usage and, therefore, clinicians and stakeholders should sensitise HIV-infected women on the importance of contraceptive use in the fight against HIV/AIDS and encourage them to use contraceptives to avoid vertical transmission of HIV through unintended pregnancy.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsHIV InfectionsAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrevalenceReferral and ConsultationUgandaYoung AdultContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID29984255
PMCPMC6015709
OpenAlexW2807292127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.