ArticleVascular specialist international2018
Does Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Prevent Postthrombotic Syndrome?
Article in Vascular specialist international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to identify risk factors of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) and evaluate the efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for preventing the development of PTS in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom 2005 January to 2013 December, 139 limbs of 126 patients were included in this study who had the first episode of proximal DVT at the affected limb and who had visited our out-patient clinic. CDT was performed on 55 limbs (39.6%). We achieved complete recanalization in 39 limbs (70.9%) and partial recanalization (residual thrombus <50.0%) in 16 limbs (29.1%). We retrospectively reviewed medical records for possible predictors of PTS.
resultsMedian follow-up duration was 83 months (range, 30-136 months). No differences were found between the CDT and non-CDT group in age, gender, duration of symptom, use of anticoagulation and recurrence of DVT. A significantly higher thrombotic burden was observed in the CDT group (P=0.009). In a binary logistic regression model, patients with PTS had significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR], 1.303; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.079-1.574; P=0.006) and longer thrombotic burden involved in ilio-femoro-popliteal DVT (OR, 3.666; 95% CI, 1.093-12.296; P=0.035). CDT did not influence the risk of PTS (P>0.05).
conclusionWe suggest that CDT is not effective in preventing PTS, while higher BMI and longer thrombotic burden are associated with the development of PTS in patients with DVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.