Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29984193›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2018

Optimization of phenol-chloroform RNA extraction.

Lee S Toni, Anastacia M Garcia, Danielle A Jeffrey, Xuan Jiang, Brian L Stauffer, Shelley D Miyamoto, Carmen C Sucharov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influenza A Virus Coinfection AltersbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of 17α-Ethinylestradiol on Development and Gonadal Differentiation in the Estuarine Mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lee S ToniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Anastacia M GarciaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Danielle A JeffreyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Xuan JiangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Brian L StaufferDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Shelley D MiyamotoDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Carmen C SucharovDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reliable analysis of gene expression depends on the extraction of pure and high-quality RNA. However, while the conventional phenol-chloroform RNA extraction is preferable over silica-based columns, particularly when cost is a concern or higher RNA yield is desired, it can result in significant RNA contamination. Contaminants including excess phenol, chloroform, or salts, can have significant impacts on downstream applications, including RNA quantification and reverse transcription, that can skew data collection and interpretation. To overcome the issue of RNA contamination in the conventional phenol-chloroform based RNA extraction method, we have optimized the protocol by adding one chloroform extraction step, and several RNA washing steps. Importantly, RNA quality and purity and accuracy in the quantification of RNA concentration were significantly improved with the modified protocol, resulting in reliable data collection and interpretation in downstream gene expression analysis. •Our protocol is customized by the addition of a second chloroform extraction step. Chloroform is carefully pipetted so as to not disturb the interphase layer. Any contaminants accidentally removed from interphase will be present in subsequent steps and can result in RNA contaminated with protein or phenol. The additional chloroform step increases RNA purity.•Additionally, the addition of 2 additional ethanol washes, initially intended to remove any residual salts from the isopropanol RNA precipitation step, also removed residual phenol contamination, enhancing RNA purity.•In summary, these modifications serve to enhance not only the purity of the RNA but, also increase the accuracy and reliability of RNA quantification.

Indexed as

NRVMNRVMsPhenol-chloroform extractionPhenol-chloroform RNA extractionRNA contaminationRNA extractionRNA purificationRNA purityRNA quantificationRT-qPCR

Identifiers

PMID29984193
PMCPMC6031757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.