ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018
Baseline multimodal information predicts future motor impairment in premanifest Huntington's disease.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The presymptomatic phase of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: are we merely scratching the surface?Journal of neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Alzheimer's Disease Brain Phenotypes are Age-dependent.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Geometric properties of caudate and putamen mark the progression of Huntington's disease.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Volumetric MRI-Based Biomarkers in Huntington's Disease: An Evidentiary Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Huntington's disease (HD), accurate estimates of expected future motor impairments are key for clinical trials. Individual prognosis is only partially explained by genetics. However, studies so far have focused on predicting the time to clinical diagnosis based on fixed impairment levels, as opposed to predicting impairment in time windows comparable to the duration of a clinical trial. Here we evaluate an approach to both detect atrophy patterns associated with early degeneration and provide a prognosis of motor impairment within 3 years, using data from the TRACK-HD study on 80 premanifest HD (pre-HD) individuals and 85 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We integrate anatomical MRI information from gray matter concentrations (estimated via voxel-based morphometry) together with baseline data from demographic, genetic and motor domains to distinguish individuals at high risk of developing pronounced future motor impairment from those at low risk. We evaluate the ability of models to distinguish between these two groups solely using baseline imaging data, as well as in combination with longitudinal imaging or non-imaging data. Our models show improved performance for motor prognosis through the incorporation of imaging features to non-imaging data, reaching 88% cross-validated accuracy when using baseline non-longitudinal information, and detect informative correlates in the caudate nucleus and the thalamus both for motor prognosis and early atrophy detection. These results show the plausibility of using baseline imaging and basic demographic/genetic measures for early detection of individuals at high risk of severe future motor impairment in relatively short timeframes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.