Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29984084›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Fundus autofluorescence beyond lipofuscin: lesson learned from

Martin Hammer, Lydia Sauer, Matthias Klemm, Sven Peters, Rowena Schultz, Jens Haueisen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin HammerUniversity Hospital Jena, Department of Ophthalmology, 07747 Jena, Am Klinikum 1, Germany.
Lydia SauerUniversity Hospital Jena, Department of Ophthalmology, 07747 Jena, Am Klinikum 1, Germany.
Matthias KlemmTechnical University Ilmenau, Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Gustav-Kirchhoff-Str. 2, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Sven PetersUniversity Hospital Jena, Department of Ophthalmology, 07747 Jena, Am Klinikum 1, Germany.
Rowena SchultzUniversity Hospital Jena, Department of Ophthalmology, 07747 Jena, Am Klinikum 1, Germany.
Jens HaueisenTechnical University Ilmenau, Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Gustav-Kirchhoff-Str. 2, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DETechnische Universität Ilmenau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging is a well-established method in ophthalmology; however, the fluorophores involved need more clarification. The FAF lifetimes of 20 post mortem porcine eyes were measured in two spectral channels using fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) and compared with clinical data from 44 healthy young subjects. The FAF intensity ratio of the short and the long wavelength emission (spectral ratio) was determined.

Indexed as

(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology(170.3650) Lifetime-based sensing(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.4470) Ophthalmology(170.6510) Spectroscopy, tissue diagnostics(300.2530) Fluorescence, laser-induced

Identifiers

PMID29984084
PMCPMC6033583
OpenAlexW2808520358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.