Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29984082›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Effect of patch size and network architecture on a convolutional neural network approach for automatic segmentation of OCT retinal layers.

Jared Hamwood, David Alonso-Caneiro, Scott A Read, Stephen J Vincent, Michael J Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Automatic Visual Acuity Loss Prediction in Children with Optic Pathway Gliomas using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jared HamwoodContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David Alonso-CaneiroContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Scott A ReadContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Stephen J VincentContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Michael J CollinsContact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning strategies, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are especially suited to finding patterns in images and using those patterns for image classification. The method is normally applied to an image patch and assigns a class weight to the patch; this method has recently been used to detect the probability of retinal boundary locations in OCT images, which is subsequently used to segment the OCT image using a graph-search approach. This paper examines the effects of a number of modifications to the CNN architecture with the aim of optimizing retinal layer segmentation, specifically the effect of patch size as well as the network architecture design on CNN performance and subsequent layer segmentation. The results demonstrate that increasing patch size can improve the performance of the classification and provides a more reliable segmentation in the analysis of retinal layer characteristics in OCT imaging. Similarly, this work shows that changing aspects of the CNN network design can also significantly improve the segmentation results. This work also demonstrates that the performance of the method can change depending on the number of classes (i.e. boundaries) used to train the CNN, with fewer classes showing an inferior performance due to the presence of similar image features between classes that can trigger false positives. Changes in the network (patch size and or architecture) can be applied to provide a superior segmentation performance, which is robust to the class effect. The findings from this work may inform future CNN development in OCT retinal image analysis.

Indexed as

(100.0100) Image processing(100.2960) Image analysis(110.4500) Optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID29984082
PMCPMC6033561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.