Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29983982›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2018

Sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care circulating Cathodic antigen test before and after praziquantel treatment in diagnosing

Humphrey D Mazigo, Stella Kepha, Safari M Kinung'hi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reproducibility matters: intra- and inter-sample variation of the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen test in twoPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Humphrey D Mazigo1Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Stella Kepha2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Safari M Kinung'hi3National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Research Centre, P.O. Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Institute for Medical Research · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) on CD4

methodsA prospective longitudinal study was conducted among individuals aged 15-55 years at Igalagala village, north-western Tanzania. At baseline and 4 weeks after treatment, a single stool and urine samples were collected from each participants. Kato Katz (KK) technique and Point-of-Care Circulating Cathodic Antigen tests were used for diagnosis of

resultsAt baseline, based on KK and POC-CCA, the prevalence of

conclusionThe sensitivity of POC-CCA in diagnosing

Indexed as

AdultHIV-1Point-of-care circulating Cathodic antigenSchistosoma mansoniSensitivitySpecificityTanzania

Identifiers

PMID29983982
PMCPMC6016140
OpenAlexW2808281914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.