Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29983911›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Sex/gender differences in cognition, neurophysiology, and neuroanatomy.

Lutz Jäncke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sex/Gender Differences in Verbal Fluency and Verbal-Episodic Memory: A Meta-Analysis.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Autistic Adults Avoid Unpredictability in Decision-Making.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interactive Relations of Body Mass Index, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Sex to Cognitive Function in Older Adults.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Article
  12. Role of the STING→IRF3 Pathway in Ambient GABA Homeostasis and Cognitive Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Sex as a Determinant of Age-Related Changes in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lutz JänckeDivision of Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-9067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this mini-review, I summarize and interpret the current status of sex/gender differences in terms of brain anatomy, brain function, behavior, and cognition. Based on this review and the reported findings, I conclude that most of these sex/gender differences are not large enough to support the assumption of sexual dimorphism in terms of brain anatomy, brain function, cognition, and behavior. Instead, I suggest that many brain and cognitive features are modulated by environment, culture, and practice (and several other influences). These influences interact with the menstrual cycle, the general hormone level, and current gender stereotypes in a way that has not yet been fully understood.

Indexed as

brain anatomybrain functioncognitionSex/gender differences

Identifiers

PMID29983911
PMCPMC6013760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.