ReviewMemo2018
Management of adverse events related to checkpoint inhibition therapy.
Review in Memo, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of dermatological toxicities in patients with melanoma undergoing immunotherapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Gastritis as an immunotherapy-related toxicity in the treatment of endometrial cancer: A case report.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Induced Hepatotoxicity; Gastroenterologists' Perspectives.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2022Review
- Epidemiology and risk factors for the development of cutaneous toxicities in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A United States population-level analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2022Article
- Neuro-ophthalmic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Current status and future directions.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Prediction of severe immune-related adverse events requiring hospital admission in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors: study of a population level insurance claims database from the USA.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Article
- Navigating Diagnostic and Treatment Decisions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Expert Commentary on the Multidisciplinary Team Approach.The oncologist · 2021Review
- Sequential MR Image-Guided Local Immune Checkpoint Blockade Cancer Immunotherapy Using Ferumoxytol Capped Ultralarge Pore Mesoporous Silica Carriers after Standard Chemotherapy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2019Article
- Seronegative autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy from dual immune checkpoint inhibition in a patient with metastatic melanoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2019Article
- Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Unchecked immunity: a unique case of sequential immune-related adverse events with Pembrolizumab.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2019Article
- Delayed immune-related events (DIRE) after discontinuation of immunotherapy: diagnostic hazard of autoimmunity at a distance.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2019Review
- MicroRNAs aid the assessment of programmed death ligand 1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Checkpoint inhibitors: What gastroenterologists need to know.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Cytomegalovirus infection among patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IO treatments (immuno-oncology treatments) have become reality and are now daily practice or, in some cases, a daily challenge. New recommendations are being made with the prime purpose of increasing alertness and awareness as well as emphasizing standard operating strategies to deal with immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This brief review refers to systemic reviews, guidelines and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and case series published from 2000 to the present. Existing recommendations for optimal management of toxicities vary according to organ systems affected and grading. Grade 1 toxicities (exception to the rule: neurologic, hematologic, cardiac manifestation) require close monitoring. Grade 2 toxicities prompt immediate treatment interruption combined with corticosteroid administration (prednisone or methylprednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day) until the symptoms revert to grade 1 or less. ir-AEs up to grade 3 or 4 justify suspension of treatment together with increased dosage of prednisone or methylprednisolone (1-2 mg/kg/day) combined with close monitoring to continuously adapt the current immunosuppressive strategy. In some cases, a different additional immunosuppressive agent has to be evaluated. Only when all symptoms have disappeared and immunosuppressive treatment produces a response can all immunosuppressive agents be tapered. Endocrinopathies are the exception to the rule and are mostly controllable by hormone replacement, at least in low-grade manifestation. This short review focuses on the main aspects that help manage immune-related side-effects and elucidates all the additional aspects surrounding and contributing to successful treatment and management of cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.