ArticleOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences2018
Comparative Analysis of the Applicability of Island Flap in Primary and Recurrent Basal Cell Carcinomas of Similar Localization.
Article in Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modified island flap for basal cell carcinoma of the nasal apex.Dermatology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBasal cell carcinoma belongs to non-melanoma skin cancers and is the most prevalent neoplasia that shows a tendency to increase over the last few decades. It occurs most often in skin areas exposed to sunlight. It is characterised by slow progression, low tendency to metastasising and good prognosis when the right choice of treatment has been made. The difficulty in the treatment of basal cell carcinomas is determined by their localisation and puts to the test the aesthetic potential of dermatosurgeons. Complete surgical excision is the standard approach in most uncomplicated cases. In relapsing basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma with aggressive or unfavourable histopathological characteristics, the clinician faces the dilemma of identifying the most appropriate method of treatment. To find the decision, help comes from the individualisation of each case and the related risk factors. CASE REPORT: Two cases of basal cell carcinoma of similar localisation are presented, where the carcinomas are removed using island flaps. In spite of the desire to observe the recommended field of surgical security (by the desire for the ultimate esthetic effect for the patient), one of the tumours was not completely removed, and as an alternative, reoperation was proposed using Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).
conclusionThe choice of a surgical technique, which would guarantee a better outcome and could be applied depending on the individual risk factor in each patient, is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.