Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29983718›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2018

Heat-induced necrosis after bronchial thermoplasty: a new concern?

Francesco Menzella, Mirco Lusuardi, Carla Galeone, Gloria Montanari, Alberto Cavazza, Nicola Facciolongo

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco MenzellaDepartment of Medical Specialties, Pneumology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Viale Risorgimento 56, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3950-5789
Mirco LusuardiUnit of Respiratory Rehabilitation, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia, S. Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio, Italy.
Carla GaleoneDepartment of Medical Specialties, Pneumology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Viale Risorgimento 56, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gloria MontanariDepartment of Medical Specialties, Pneumology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Viale Risorgimento 56, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Alberto CavazzaDepartment of Pathology, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia, Vial Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Nicola FacciolongoDepartment of Medical Specialties, Pneumology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Viale Risorgimento 56, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Maria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an endoscopic procedure for the treatment of severe refractory asthma, based on the local airways delivery of radio-frequency at 65 °C. Several controlled clinical studies demonstrated the effectiveness of BT on clinical outcomes, particularly the reduction of asthma exacerbations. During procedure or shortly after, significant but transient respiratory adverse events have been reported. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a male, caucasian, 56-year-old, non-smoker patient with non-allergic severe asthma. A few days after the second BT session performed in the left lower lobe, persistent haemoptysis appeared requiring patient hospitalization. A chest CT scan showed mild varicoid bronchiectasis and distal parenchymal infiltrate in the basal anterior segment of the left lower lobe. At fibreoptic bronchoscopy two small nodular neoformations were observed in sub-segmental areas of the same lobe. Histological examination showed mild non-specific inflammation of bronchial mucosa, and some large fragments of peribronchial pulmonary parenchyma with an area of haemorrhagic necrosis. The patient was treated empirically with co-amoxiclav, azithromycin and prednisone. A new chest CT showed a complete resolution of the parenchymal opacity. Finally, the patient underwent the third session of BT, without recurrence of haemoptysis or radiological changes. DISCUSSION: Bronchial thermoplasty is a generally safe procedure. To our knowledge this is the first report of necrosis of the treated bronchus and haemoptysis complicating BT after the second session. The pulmonary damage was most likely determined by a thermal shock induced by BT. One hypothesis could be a structural fragility of the treated bronchus, possibly related to bronchiectasis. A technical malfunction of the BT controller or the catheter, causing an excessive energy delivery could not be excluded. Adverse events following BT deserve particular attention but should not discourage clinicians from the application of this promising procedure.

Indexed as

Bronchial thermoplastyHaemoptysisNecrosisSevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID29983718
PMCPMC6016132
OpenAlexW2807557310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.