Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29983706›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2018

Test-Retest Reliability of Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Primary Motor Cortex.

Tribikram Thapa, Siobhan M Schabrun

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04324801 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Aftereffects and Reliability of Two Homeostatic Plasticity Induction Protocols

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsHealthyArmsHomeostatic plasticity induction using transcranial direct current stimulation
NCT04485689 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Capsaicin-induced Pain on Homeostatic Plasticity in Healthy Human Participants

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled24ConditionsHealthyArmsCapsaicin Topical - alone, Placebo - alone, Capsaicin Topical - ice, Placebo - ice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tribikram ThapaBrain Rehabilitation and Neuroplasticity Unit, School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Siobhan M SchabrunBrain Rehabilitation and Neuroplasticity Unit, School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9083-3107
Western Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homeostatic plasticity regulates synaptic activity by preventing uncontrolled increases (long-term potentiation) or decreases (long-term depression) in synaptic efficacy. Homeostatic plasticity can be induced and assessed in the human primary motor cortex (M1) using noninvasive brain stimulation. However, the reliability of this methodology has not been investigated. Here, we examined the test-retest reliability of homeostatic plasticity induced and assessed in M1 using noninvasive brain stimulation in ten, right-handed, healthy volunteers on days 0, 2, 7, and 14. Homeostatic plasticity was induced in the left M1 using two blocks of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied for 7 min and 5 min, separated by a 3 min interval. To assess homeostatic plasticity, 15 motor-evoked potentials to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded at baseline, between the two blocks of anodal tDCS, and at 0 min, 10 min, and 20 min follow-up. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Moderate-to-good test-retest reliability was observed for the M1 homeostatic plasticity response at all follow-up time points (0 min, 10 min, and 20 min, ICC range: 0.43-0.67) at intervals up to 2 weeks. The greatest reliability was observed when the homeostatic response was assessed at 10 min follow-up (ICC > 0.61). These data suggest that M1 homeostatic plasticity can be reliably induced and assessed in healthy individuals using two blocks of anodal tDCS at intervals of 48 hours, 7 days, and 2 weeks.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultCortical ExcitabilityEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHomeostasisHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29983706
PMCPMC6015686
OpenAlexW2807377041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.