Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29983697›Full record

ArticleComptes rendus. Chimie (Print)2011

Synthetic Biology, Tinkering Biology, and Artificial Biology. What are We Learning?

Steven A Benner, Zunyi Yang, Fei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comptes rendus. Chimie (Print), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution of functional six-nucleotide DNA.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015
    Article
  11. In vitro selection with artificial expanded genetic information systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  12. Chemical synthetic biology.Science progress · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Aesthetics in synthesis and synthetic biology.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2012
    Review
  16. Are we doing synthetic biology?Systems and synthetic biology · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven A BennerFoundation for Applied Molecular Evolution and The Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology.
Zunyi YangFoundation for Applied Molecular Evolution and The Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology.
Fei ChenFoundation for Applied Molecular Evolution and The Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology.

Funding

Chemistry to Improve Human Genomic Array Analysis ArchitecturesR01HG004647 · NHGRI · FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED MOLECULAR EVOLUTN · PI BENNER, STEVEN A · 2008 to 2010
$1.8M
Near Term Development of Reagents and Enzymes for Genome SequencingR01HG004831 · NHGRI · FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED MOLECULAR EVOLUTN · PI BENNER, STEVEN A · 2008 to 2010
$1.4M
Biochemical and pharmacological studies of human membrane progesterone receptorsR01GM086617 · NIGMS · FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED MOLECULAR EVOLUTN · PI CHAMBERLIN, STEPHEN G · 2009 to 2013
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004647NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004831NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While chemical theory cannot yet support an engineering vision that allows molecules, DNA sequences, and proteins to be interchangeable parts in artificial constructs without "tinkering", progress can be made in synthetic biology by pursuing challenges at the limits of existing theory. These force scientists across uncharted terrain where they must address unscripted problems where, if theory is inadequate, failure results. Thus, synthesis drives discovery and paradigm change in ways that analysis cannot. Further, if failures are analyzed, new theories emerge. Here, we illustrate this by synthesizing an artificial genetic system capable of Darwinian evolution, a feature theorized to be universal to life.

Indexed as

biobricksMars explorationNucleic acidspaleogeneticsphilosophy of sciencesynthetic biologytinkering

Identifiers

PMID29983697
PMCPMC6034680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.