ArticleInternational journal of wireless information networks2017
On-line EEG Denoising and Cleaning Using Correlated Sparse Recovery and Active Learning.
Article in International journal of wireless information networks, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep active learning for Interictal Ictal Injury Continuum EEG patterns.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have developed two new methods that use sparse recovery and active learning techniques for near real-time artifact identification and removal in EEG recordings. The first algorithm, called Correlated Sparse Signal Recovery (CSSR) addresses the problem of structured sparse signal recovery when statistical rather than exact properties describing the structure of the signal are appropriate, as in the elimination of eye movement artifacts; such tasks cannot be done efficiently using structured models that assume a common sparsity profile of fixed groups of components. Our algorithm learns structured sparse coefficients in a Bayesian paradigm. Using it, we have successfully identified and subtracted eye movement (structured) artifacts in real EEG recordings resulting in minimal data loss. Our method outperforms ICA and standard sparse recovery algorithms by preserving both spectral and complexity properties of the denoised EEG. Our second method uses a new active selection algorithm that we call Output-based Active Selection (OAS). When applied to the task of detection of EEG epochs containing other non-structured artifacts from an ensemble of detectors, OAS boosts accuracy of the ensemble from 91% to 97.5% with only 10% active labels. Our methods can also be applied to real-time artifact removal in magnetoencephalography (MEG) and blood pressure signals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.