Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29983457›Full record

ArticleProgress in polymer science2018

Electroactive polymers for tissue regeneration: Developments and perspectives.

Chengyun Ning, Zhengnan Zhou, Guoxin Tan, Ye Zhu, Chuanbin Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in polymer science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Open Challenges and Opportunities in Piezoelectricity for Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Electrostrategies in orthopaedic research.Biomaterials translational · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chengyun NingSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zhengnan ZhouSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Guoxin TanInstitute of Chemical Engineering and Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Ye ZhuDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Stephenson Life Sciences Research Center, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019-5300, United States.
Chuanbin MaoDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Stephenson Life Sciences Research Center, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019-5300, United States.

Funding

Virus-based nanoparticles for detecting breast cancer biomarkersR01EB021339 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI CAO, BINRUI · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
Selective tumor inhibition by tumor-homing angiogenesis-suppressing nanofibersR21CA200504 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI MAO, CHUANBIN · 2015 to 2016
$361k
Hiring Non-toxic Virus Nanoparticles to Count Cancer Biomarker MoleculesR21CA195607 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI MAO, CHUANBIN · 2015 to 2016
$359k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195607NCI NIH HHS R21 CA200504NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human body motion can generate a biological electric field and a current, creating a voltage gradient of -10 to -90 mV across cell membranes. In turn, this gradient triggers cells to transmit signals that alter cell proliferation and differentiation. Several cell types, counting osteoblasts, neurons and cardiomyocytes, are relatively sensitive to electrical signal stimulation. Employment of electrical signals in modulating cell proliferation and differentiation inspires us to use the electroactive polymers to achieve electrical stimulation for repairing impaired tissues. Electroactive polymers have found numerous applications in biomedicine due to their capability in effectively delivering electrical signals to the seeded cells, such as biosensing, tissue regeneration, drug delivery, and biomedical implants. Here we will summarize the electrical characteristics of electroactive polymers, which enables them to electrically influence cellular function and behavior, including conducting polymers, piezoelectric polymers, and polyelectrolyte gels. We will also discuss the biological response to these electroactive polymers under electrical stimulation. In particular, we focus this review on their applications in regenerating different tissues, including bone, nerve, heart muscle, cartilage and skin. Additionally, we discuss the challenges in tissue regeneration applications of electroactive polymers. We conclude that electroactive polymers have a great potential as regenerative biomaterials, due to their ability to stimulate desirable outcomes in various electrically responsive cells.

Indexed as

Conducting PolymersElectroactive PolymersPiezoelectric PolymersPolyelectrolyte GelsTissue Regeneration

Identifiers

PMID29983457
PMCPMC6029263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.