ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018
Microwave-Assisted Ablation Improves the Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Resection.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2023Pooled it
- NLR-PALBI Score and Its Grading: Predicting Overall Survival of Patients with Primary Liver Cancer Undergoing Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolisation.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Ablative Therapies for Solid Tumors: Recent Advances and Clinical Applications.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated microwave-assisted liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe enrolled 79 patients in this study, and microwave ablation was used for liver resection. Patients were randomized to group A (50.6%; n = 40), liver resection without microwave ablation, or group B (49.4%; n = 39), liver resection performed using microwave ablation. Data were analyzed for statistical significance.
resultsOf the participants enrolled, 60 were male, and the participant's average age was 59.32 ± 10.34 years. The mean overall tumor diameter was 4.39 (2.00) cm, and this did not differ between groups. Intraoperative blood loss in group B was significantly less than that in group A ( P < .001). No differences were reported between the 2 groups regarding surgical time ( P = .914), postoperative morbidity ( P = .718), and late postoperative complications ( P = .409). Postoperative drainage volume for group B was less than that of group A on the first ( P = .005) and third ( P = .019) day after surgery. The time of postoperative hospitalization in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A ( P < .001). Local recurrence was noted in 18.99% of cases (n = 15) in group B, which is less than that of group A ( P = 0.047), while in group B distant metastasis is less but not statistically significant ( P = 0.061). The 1-year and 3-year cumulative survival rates were 57% and 93.7%, respectively.
conclusionsThe curative effects of liver resection combined with microwave ablation during operation are superior to only liver resection in the treatment of primary liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.