Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982982›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2019

Endothelial Cell Dysfunction and Injury in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

T Peeyush Kumar, Devin W McBride, Pramod K Dash, Kanako Matsumura, Alba Rubi, Spiros L Blackburn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Haemorrhage, hypercoagulability and ischaemia: Evolution of brain injury after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T Peeyush KumarThe Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Peeyush.K.Thankamanipandit@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-6602
Devin W McBrideThe Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Pramod K DashDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 77225, USA.
Kanako MatsumuraThe Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Alba RubiThe Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Spiros L BlackburnThe Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

American Heart Association 18CDA34110036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the brain, vascular endothelial cells conserve blood viscosity, control blood flow, and form the interface between central nervous system and circulating blood. Clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is linked to early brain injury, cerebral vasospasm, and other causes of delayed cerebral ischemia. The cerebral vasculature remains a unique target for therapies since it becomes rapidly disrupted after subarachnoid hemorrhage, and damage to the blood vessels continues into the delayed injury phase. The current failure of therapies to improve clinical outcome warrants a re-evaluation of current therapeutic approaches. The mechanisms of endothelial cell injury and blood-brain barrier breakdown are critical to the pathway of cerebral injury, and an improved understanding of these mechanisms may lead to novel therapeutic targets. This review provides an update on the current understanding of endothelial cell injury following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, including blood-brain barrier dysfunction.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrain IschemiaEndothelial CellsHumansSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialBlood–brain barrierCerebral vasospasmEndothelial cellMicrothrombosisSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID29982982
OpenAlexW2881055842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.