ArticlePediatric radiology2018
Can diffusion weighting replace gadolinium enhancement in magnetic resonance enterography for inflammatory bowel disease in children?
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging of Ulcerative Colitis: The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Role of abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MR-enterography in the evaluation of Crohn's disease activity and complications as an alternative for full protocol contrast-enhanced study: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2023Article
- Paediatric gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary radiology: why do we need subspecialists, and what is new?Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Advances in Diagnostic Imaging in Pediatric Gastroenterology.Current gastroenterology reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContrast-enhanced MRI is often used for diagnosis and follow-up of children with inflammatory bowel disease.
objectiveTo compare the accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) to contrast-enhanced MRI in children with known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective, consecutive study included 55 children. We used ileo-colonoscopy and histology as the reference standard from the terminal ileum to the rectum, and contrast-enhanced MRI as the reference standard proximal to the terminal ileum. DWI and contrast-enhanced MRI sequences were independently reviewed and compared per patient and per segment to these reference standards and to the follow-up for each child.
resultsWe obtained endoscopic data for 340/385 colonic and ileal segments (88%). The rate of agreement per segment between DWI and endoscopy was 64%, and the rate of agreement between contrast-enhanced MRI and endoscopy was 59%. Per patient, sensitivity and specificity of bowel wall abnormalities as compared to the endoscopy were 87% and 100% for DWI, and 70% and 100% for contrast-enhanced MRI, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 100% and 57% for DWI, and 96% and 41% for contrast-enhanced MRI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of DWI compare to contrast-enhanced MRI in the segments proximal to the terminal ileum were 90%, 98%, 90%, 98% and 96%, respectively.
conclusionThe diagnostic performance of DWI is competitive to that of contrast-enhanced MRI in children with known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.