Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982892›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2018

Genotyping DNA isolated from UV irradiated human bloodstains using whole genome amplification.

Seisaku Uchigasaki, Jian Tie, Erina Sobashima, Naomi Shimada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. New Perspectives for Whole Genome Amplification in Forensic STR Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seisaku UchigasakiDivision of Legal Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 1738610, Japan.
Jian TieDivision of Legal Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 1738610, Japan. tetsu.ken@nihon-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-8421
Erina SobashimaDivision of Legal Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 1738610, Japan.
Naomi ShimadaDivision of Legal Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 1738610, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of DNA polymorphisms are the primary technique used for personal identification in forensic cases. However, DNA samples collected as evidence from crime scenes are usually degraded by environmental, physical, and chemical factors, which may interfere with the PCR analysis and, consequently, personal identification. Whole genome amplification (WGA) is a useful method to amplify genomic DNA from samples containing low quantity and poor quality of DNA, and it approach that shows promise to overcome the limited small fragments based upon random fragmentation by universal priming sites. In this study, we describe the use of WGA to genotype 15 short tandem repeat (STR) loci from dried blood samples irradiated with different types of ultraviolet (UV) light (UVA, UVB, and UVC). The result showed that UVC was the most damaging to DNA, followed by UVB and UVA. Samples exposed to UVA could be genotyped for all STR loci with or without WGA. For UVB and UVC irradiated blood samples, a greater number of STR loci could be genotyped after WGA. Although it hard to amplified a few higher molecular weight alleles, overall, the WGA method was useful in genotyping template DNA of poor quality but low quantity.

Indexed as

Blood StainsDNADried Blood Spot TestingForensic GeneticsGenome, HumanGenotyping TechniquesHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDNABloodstainForensic individual identificationSTR profileUltraviolet lightWhole genome amplification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.