ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2018
Use of genomic and functional analysis to characterize patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrinsic tumor necrosis factor-α pathway is activated in a subset of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Past and future in vitro and in vivo approaches toward circulating factors and biomarkers in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Rate and Risk Factors for Post-transplant Disease Recurrence in Children With Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Understanding the Current Landscape of Kidney Disease in Canada to Advance Precision Medicine Guided Personalized Care.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023Review
- Biomarkers in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Optimal Diagnostic-Therapeutic Strategy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Nephrotic syndrome in a dish: recent developments in modeling in vitro.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Review
- Molecular stratification of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with genetic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) usually do well after renal transplantation, while some with idiopathic SRNS show recurrence due to a putative podocyte-toxic factor. Distinguishing different forms of SRNS based on clinical criteria has been difficult. The aim of our study was to test a novel approach that allows categorization of patients into clinically useful subgroups.
methodsSeventeen patients with clinically confirmed SRNS were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 37 known SRNS genes and a functional assay of cultured human podocytes, which indirectly tests for toxicity of patients' sera by evidenced loss of podocyte focal adhesion complex (FAC) number.
resultsWe identified a pathogenic mutation in seven patients (41%). Sera from patients with monogenic SRNS caused mild loss of FAC number down to 73% compared to untreated controls, while sera from seven of the remaining ten patients with idiopathic SRNS caused significant FAC number loss to 43% (non-overlapping difference 30%, 95% CI 26-36%, P < 0.001). All patients with recurrent SRNS (n = 4) in the graft showed absence of podocyte gene mutations but significant FAC loss. Three patients had no mutation nor serum podocyte toxicity.
conclusionsOur approach allowed categorization of patients into three subgroups: (1) patients with monogenic SRNS; (2) patients with idiopathic SRNS and marked serum podocyte toxicity; and (3) patients without identifiable genetic cause nor evidence of serum podocyte toxicity. Post-transplant SRNS recurrence risk appears to be low in groups 1 and 3, but high in group 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.