Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982635›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

Chromosomal over-replication in Escherichia coli recG cells is triggered by replication fork fusion and amplified if replichore symmetry is disturbed.

Sarah L Midgley-Smith, Juachi U Dimude, Toni Taylor, Nicole M Forrester, Amy L Upton, Robert G Lloyd, Christian J Rudolph

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification ofJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah L Midgley-SmithDivision of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Juachi U DimudeDivision of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Toni TaylorDivision of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Nicole M ForresterDivision of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Amy L UptonDivision of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Robert G LloydMedical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Christian J RudolphDivision of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Brunel University of London · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K015729/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N014995/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome duplication initiates via the assembly of replication forks at defined origins. Forks proceed in opposite directions until they fuse with a converging fork. Recent work highlights that fork fusions are highly choreographed both in pro- and eukaryotic cells. The circular Escherichia coli chromosome is replicated from a single origin (oriC), and a single fork fusion takes place in a specialised termination area opposite oriC that establishes a fork trap mediated by Tus protein bound at ter sequences that allows forks to enter but not leave. Here we further define the molecular details of fork fusions and the role of RecG helicase in replication termination. Our data support the idea that fork fusions have the potential to trigger local re-replication of the already replicated DNA. In ΔrecG cells this potential is realised in a substantial fraction of cells and is dramatically elevated when one fork is trapped for some time before the converging fork arrives. They also support the idea that the termination area evolved to contain such over-replication and we propose that the stable arrest of replication forks at ter/Tus complexes is an important feature that limits the likelihood of problems arising as replication terminates.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, GeneticMutationNucleic Acid ConformationReplication OriginDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsRecG protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID29982635
PMCPMC6125675
OpenAlexW2811245672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.