Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982543›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Cancer Rehabilitation Research (1992-2016).

Nicole L Stout, Catherine M Alfano, Christopher W Belter, Ralph Nitkin, Alison Cernich, Karen Lohmann Siegel, Leighton Chan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Bibliometric visualization analysis based on thecorrelation between cancer pain and psychosocialfactors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bibliometric view on cancer rehabilitation and cancer physiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Research hotspots and trends in cancer rehabilitation: a bibliometric analysis (2013-2023).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessment of rehabilitation practices during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the United States: a survey.Rehabilitation oncology (American Physical Therapy Association. Oncology Section) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole L StoutNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Bethesda, MD.
Catherine M AlfanoAmerican Cancer Society, Washington, DC.
Christopher W BelterNational Institutes of Health Library, Bethesda, MD.
Ralph NitkinEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, Rockville, MD.
Alison CernichEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, Rockville, MD.
Karen Lohmann SiegelDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Washington, DC.
Leighton ChanNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Bethesda, MD.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USAmerican Cancer Society · USNational Institutes of Health · USRehabilitation Research and Development Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer rehabilitation research has accelerated as great attention has focused on improving survivorship care. Recent expert consensus has attempted to prioritize research needs and suggests greater focus on studying physical functioning of survivors. However, no analysis of the publication landscape has substantiated these proposed needs. This manuscript provides an analysis of PubMed indexed articles related to cancer rehabilitation published between 1992 and 2017. A total of 22 171 publications were analyzed using machine learning and text analysis to assess publication metrics, topic areas of emphasis, and their interrelationships through topic similarity networks. Publications have increased at a rate of 136 articles per year. Approximately 10% of publications were funded by the National Institutes of Health institutes and centers, with the National Cancer Institute being the most prominent funder. The greatest volume and rate of publication increase were in the topics of Cognitive and Behavioral Therapies and Psychological Interventions, followed by Depression and Exercise Therapy. Four research topic similarity networks were identified and provide insight on areas of robust publication and notable deficits. Findings suggest that publication emphasis has strongly supported cognitive, behavioral, and psychological therapies; however, studies of functional morbidity and physical rehabilitation research are lacking. Three areas of publication deficits are noted: research on populations outside of breast, prostate, and lung cancers; methods for integrating physical rehabilitation services with cancer care, specifically regarding functional screening and assessment; and physical rehabilitation interventions. These deficits align with the needs identified by expert consensus and support the supposition that future research should emphasize a focus on physical rehabilitation.

Indexed as

BibliometricsRehabilitation ResearchCancer SurvivorsHumansNeeds AssessmentNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29982543
PMCPMC6279275
OpenAlexW2810322781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.