ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2018
The influence of sigma factors and ribosomal recognition elements on heterologous expression of cyanobacterial gene clusters in Escherichia coli.
Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Green genes from blue greens: challenges and solutions to unlocking the potential of cyanobacteria in drug discovery.Natural product reports · 2026Review
- Mangrove cyanobacterial diversity as a source of bioactive natural products.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Heterologous production of cyanobacterial compounds.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Review
- Identification of promoter elements in the Dolichospermum circinale AWQC131C saxitoxin gene cluster and the experimental analysis of their use for heterologous expression.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- Emerging Species and Genome Editing Tools: Future Prospects in Cyanobacterial Synthetic Biology.Microorganisms · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cyanobacterial natural products offer new possibilities for drugs and lead compounds but many factors can inhibit the production of sufficient yields for pharmaceutical processes. While Escherichia coli and Streptomyces sp. have been used as heterologous expression hosts to produce cyanobacterial natural products, they have not met with resounding success largely due to their inability to recognize cyanobacterial promoter regions. Recent work has shown that the filamentous freshwater cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 recognizes various cyanobacterial promoter regions and can produce lyngbyatoxin A from the native promoter. Introduction of Anabaena sigma factors into E. coli might allow the native transcriptional machinery to recognize cyanobacterial promoters. Here, all 12 Anabaena sigma factors were expressed in E. coli and subsets were found to initiate transcription from several cyanobacterial promoters based on transcriptional fusions to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter. Expression of individual Anabaena sigma factors in E. coli did not result in lyngbyatoxin A production from its native cyanobacterial gene cluster, possibly hindered by deficiencies in recognition of cyanobacterial ribosomal binding sites by native E. coli translational machinery. This represents an important step toward engineering E. coli into a general heterologous expression host for cyanobacterial biosynthetic gene cluster expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.