Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982460›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Multiple Rounds of Artificial Selection Promote Microbe Secondary Domestication-The Case of Cachaça Yeasts.

Raquel Barbosa, Ana Pontes, Renata O Santos, Gabriela G Montandon, Camila M de Ponzzes-Gomes, Paula B Morais, Paula Gonçalves, Carlos A Rosa, José Paulo Sampaio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phylogenomics of aiScience · 2022
    Article
  10. Genomic Adaptations ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Complete genome sequence and analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain used for sugarcane spirit production.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raquel BarbosaUCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Ana PontesUCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Renata O SantosDepartamento de Microbiologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gabriela G MontandonDepartamento de Microbiologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Camila M de Ponzzes-GomesDepartamento de Microbiologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Paula B MoraisLaboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Tocantins, Palmas, Brazil.
Paula GonçalvesUCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Carlos A RosaDepartamento de Microbiologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
José Paulo SampaioUCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of microbe domestication has witnessed major advances that contribute to a better understanding of the emergence of artificially selected phenotypes and set the foundations of their rational improvement for biotechnology. Several features make Saccharomyces cerevisiae an ideal model for such a study, notably the availability of a catalogue of signatures of artificial selection and the extensive knowledge available on its biological processes. Here, we investigate with population and comparative genomics a set of strains used for cachaça fermentation, a Brazilian beverage based on the fermentation of sugar cane juice. We ask if the selective pressures posed by this fermentation have given rise to a domesticated lineage distinct from the ones already known, like wine, beer, bread, and sake yeasts. Our results show that cachaça yeasts derive from wine yeasts that have undergone an additional round of domestication, which we define as secondary domestication. As a consequence, cachaça strains combine features of wine yeasts, such as the presence of genes relevant for wine fermentation and advantageous gene inactivations, with features of beer yeasts like resistance to the effects of inhibitory compounds present in molasses. For other markers like those related to sulfite resistance and biotin metabolism our analyses revealed distributions more complex than previously reported that support the secondary domestication hypothesis. We propose a multilayered microbe domestication model encompassing not only transitions from wild to primarily domesticated populations, as in the case of wine yeasts, but also secondary domestications like those of cachaça yeasts.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAquaporinsBase SequenceFermentationGenes, FungalGenetic VariationModels, BiologicalPhylogenySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAquaporinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29982460
PMCPMC6101510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.