Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982456›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Patterns of Nucleotide Deletion and Insertion Inferred from Bacterial Pseudogenes.

Bram Danneels, Marta Pinto-Carbó, Aurelien Carlier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Structural and energetic analysis of stabilizing indel mutations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genic Selection Within Prokaryotic Pangenomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2021
    Review
  9. GENCODE Pseudogenes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Bacteriophage-Insensitive Mutants of Antimicrobial-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bram DanneelsDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Belgium.
Marta Pinto-CarbóDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Aurelien CarlierDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudogenes are a paradigm of neutral evolution and their study has the potential to reveal intrinsic mutational biases. However, this potential is mitigated by the fact that pseudogenes are quickly purged from bacterial genomes. Here, we assembled a large set of pseudogenes from genomes experiencing reductive evolution as well as functional references for which we could establish reliable phylogenetic relationships. Using this unique dataset, we identified 857 independent insertion and deletion mutations and discover a pervasive bias towards deletions, but not insertions, with sizes multiples of 3 nt. We further show that selective constraints for the preservation of gene frame are unlikely to account for the observed mutational bias and propose that a mechanistic bias in alternative end-joining repair, a recombination-independent double strand break DNA repair mechanism, is responsible for the accumulation of 3n deletions.

Indexed as

Mutagenesis, InsertionalPseudogenesSequence DeletionBacteriaDNA RepairEvolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialNucleotidesPhylogenyNucleotides

Identifiers

PMID29982456
PMCPMC6054270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.