Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982387›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Statistical tests for detecting variance effects in quantitative trait studies.

Bianca Dumitrascu, Gregory Darnell, Julien Ayroles, Barbara E Engelhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bianca DumitrascuLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Gregory DarnellLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Julien AyrolesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Barbara E EngelhardtDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Decoding and Reprogramming the Corticosteroid Transcriptional Regulatory NetworkU01HG007900 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI REDDY, TIMOTHY E · 2015 to 2017
$5.9M
A path to personalized phenotypic prediction: unlocking the context-dependency of allelic effectsR35GM124881 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Julien Ayroles · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Epigenetic fine-mapping of cardiometabolic disease loci in the human liverR01HL133218 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BROWN, CHRISTOPHER DAVID, ENGELHARDT, BARBARA · 2017 to 2020
$3.1M
Identification and validation of cell specific eQTLs by Bayesian modelingR01MH101822 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BROWN, CHRISTOPHER DAVID, ENGELHARDT, BARBARA · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007900NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133218NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124881NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Identifying variants, both discrete and continuous, that are associated with quantitative traits, or QTs, is the primary focus of quantitative genetics. Most current methods are limited to identifying mean effects, or associations between genotype or covariates and the mean value of a quantitative trait. It is possible, however, that a variant may affect the variance of the quantitative trait in lieu of, or in addition to, affecting the trait mean. Here, we develop a general methodology to identify covariates with variance effects on a quantitative trait using a Bayesian heteroskedastic linear regression model (BTH). We compare BTH with existing methods to detect variance effects across a large range of simulations drawn from scenarios common to the analysis of quantitative traits. Results: We find that BTH and a double generalized linear model (dglm) outperform classical tests used for detecting variance effects in recent genomic studies. We show BTH and dglm are less likely to generate spurious discoveries through simulations and application to identifying methylation variance QTs and expression variance QTs. We identify four variance effects of sex in the Cardiovascular and Pharmacogenetics study. Our work is the first to offer a comprehensive view of variance identifying methodology. We identify shortcomings in previously used methodology and provide a more conservative and robust alternative. We extend variance effect analysis to a wide array of covariates that enables a new statistical dimension in the study of sex and age specific quantitative trait effects. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/b2du/bth. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremLinear ModelsModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociAnalysis of VarianceComputational BiologyGenomicsHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID29982387
PMCPMC6330007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.