ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Statistical tests for detecting variance effects in quantitative trait studies.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning and statistical methods for molecular quantitative trait loci.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- POISE: Spectral Inference of Parent-of-Origin Effects in Unlabeled Genomic Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- A Robust Association Test Leveraging Unknown Genetic Interactions: Application to Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease.Genetic epidemiology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide discovery for biomarkers using quantile regression at biobank scale.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A new test for trait mean and variance detects unreported loci for blood-pressure variation.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Detecting genetic effects on phenotype variability to capture gene-by-environment interactions: a systematic method comparison.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Review
- A fast non-parametric test of association for multiple traits.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Compressed variance component mixed model reveals epistasis associated with flowering inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Assessment of two statistical approaches for variance genome-wide association studies in plants.Heredity · 2022Article
- Genome-wide variance quantitative trait locus analysis suggests small interaction effects in blood pressure traits.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Deep learning for bioimage analysis in developmental biology.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Review
- Genome-wide association analyses identify genotype-by-environment interactions of growth traits in Simmental cattle.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Genetic impacts on DNA methylation: research findings and future perspectives.Genome biology · 2021Review
- Leveraging phenotypic variability to identify genetic interactions in human phenotypes.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Variance heterogeneity genome-wide mapping for cadmium in bread wheat reveals novel genomic loci and epistatic interactions.The plant genome · 2020Article
- vqtl: An R Package for Mean-Variance QTL Mapping.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Mean-Variance QTL Mapping Identifies Novel QTL for Circadian Activity and Exploratory Behavior in Mice.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- QTL Mapping on a Background of Variance Heterogeneity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Identifying variants, both discrete and continuous, that are associated with quantitative traits, or QTs, is the primary focus of quantitative genetics. Most current methods are limited to identifying mean effects, or associations between genotype or covariates and the mean value of a quantitative trait. It is possible, however, that a variant may affect the variance of the quantitative trait in lieu of, or in addition to, affecting the trait mean. Here, we develop a general methodology to identify covariates with variance effects on a quantitative trait using a Bayesian heteroskedastic linear regression model (BTH). We compare BTH with existing methods to detect variance effects across a large range of simulations drawn from scenarios common to the analysis of quantitative traits. Results: We find that BTH and a double generalized linear model (dglm) outperform classical tests used for detecting variance effects in recent genomic studies. We show BTH and dglm are less likely to generate spurious discoveries through simulations and application to identifying methylation variance QTs and expression variance QTs. We identify four variance effects of sex in the Cardiovascular and Pharmacogenetics study. Our work is the first to offer a comprehensive view of variance identifying methodology. We identify shortcomings in previously used methodology and provide a more conservative and robust alternative. We extend variance effect analysis to a wide array of covariates that enables a new statistical dimension in the study of sex and age specific quantitative trait effects. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/b2du/bth. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.