Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29982381›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Whole Genome Sequencing of the Pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) Supports Independent Emergence of Major Teleost Clades.

Ricardo Assunção Vialle, Jorge Estefano Santana de Souza, Katia de Paiva Lopes, Diego Gomes Teixeira, Pitágoras de Azevedo Alves Sobrinho, André M Ribeiro-Dos-Santos, Carolina Furtado, Tetsu Sakamoto, Fábio Augusto Oliveira Silva, Edivaldo Herculano Corrêa de Oliveira and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Endocrine control of gill ionocyte function in euryhaline fishes.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo Assunção VialleLaboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Jorge Estefano Santana de SouzaBioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment - BioME, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Katia de Paiva LopesLaboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Diego Gomes TeixeiraBioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment - BioME, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Pitágoras de Azevedo Alves SobrinhoBioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment - BioME, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
André M Ribeiro-Dos-SantosLaboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Carolina FurtadoPrograma de Genética, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Tetsu SakamotoDepartamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Fábio Augusto Oliveira SilvaLaboratório de Cultura de Tecidos e Citogenética, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Edivaldo Herculano Corrêa de OliveiraLaboratório de Cultura de Tecidos e Citogenética, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Igor Guerreiro HamoyLaboratório de Genética Aplicada, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Paulo Pimentel AssumpçãoNúcleo de Pesquisas em Oncologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Ândrea Ribeiro-Dos-SantosLaboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
João Paulo Matos Santos LimaBioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment - BioME, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Héctor N SeuánezPrograma de Genética, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Sandro José de SouzaBioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment - BioME, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Sidney SantosLaboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Federal do Pará · BRInstituto Evandro Chagas · BRInstituto Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) is one of the world's largest freshwater fishes and member of the superorder Osteoglossomorpha (bonytongues), one of the oldest lineages of ray-finned fishes. This species is an obligate air-breather found in the basin of the Amazon River with an attractive potential for aquaculture. Its phylogenetic position among bony fishes makes the Pirarucu a relevant subject for evolutionary studies of early teleost diversification. Here, we present, for the first time, a draft genome version of the A. gigas genome, providing useful information for further functional and evolutionary studies. The A. gigas genome was assembled with 103-Gb raw reads sequenced in an Illumina platform. The final draft genome assembly was ∼661 Mb, with a contig N50 equal to 51.23 kb and scaffold N50 of 668 kb. Repeat sequences accounted for 21.69% of the whole genome, and a total of 24,655 protein-coding genes were predicted from the genome assembly, with an average of nine exons per gene. Phylogenomic analysis based on 24 fish species supported the postulation that Osteoglossomorpha and Elopomorpha (eels, tarpons, and bonefishes) are sister groups, both forming a sister lineage with respect to Clupeocephala (remaining teleosts). Divergence time estimations suggested that Osteoglossomorpha and Elopomorpha lineages emerged independently in a period of ∼30 Myr in the Jurassic. The draft genome of A. gigas provides a valuable genetic resource for further investigations of evolutionary studies and may also offer a valuable data for economic applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularFemaleFishesGenomeGenome SizeMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29982381
PMCPMC6143160
OpenAlexW2839740680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.